You can't really tell by someone's looks what their cultural background is. I'm part Native American on both sides of my family, but I look 100% European descent. My great grand father was a minimum of 50%, while his father was 100%(Or as close as you can get.), yet my grandmother and her three siblings all took after my great grandmother's European features. Because of people like this, I can't celebrate a part of my family history without being a "cultural appropriating biggot", so you really should ask, kindly, about a person background instead of assuming just by their looks.

#51 I'm like 90% that they used their native American heritage purely as an example, not suggesting Indian and native American were the same. For example, I'm more Italian and Native American but I take after my dad's british/german side.

Indian people's looks run the whole gamut. From almost Scandinavian pale to dark as night. It's impossible to just tell from looks if one is Indian or not. And I'm talking about real Indian here, not Native American

#56, you can bump that 90% up to 100.

#58, I should of specified that me using Native American was an example of not looking like your cultural background. I apologize for the confusion. I was well aware that Indian meant from India in this fml. I blame Christopher Columbus for the mix up.

i understood your meaning #62 I am Native American on both sides as well and Scott/Irish/German. My full blood sister looks more Native American while I'm told I look more Scott/Irish.

nobody gives a samosa!

Self hatred is the worst kind of hatred..

That would've been hilarious and awesome at the same time!!!

You should have popped it AT her.