Paper back writer
By Kim - 10/04/2009 07:12 - United States
By Kim - 10/04/2009 07:12 - United States
By Anonymous - 15/06/2011 00:59 - United States
By pissed_off_girl - 01/04/2013 02:59 - United States - Falls Church
By stupid - 24/12/2018 18:00
By stupid - 24/09/2009 01:18 - United States
By badessaymyass - 17/04/2014 19:59 - United States - Phoenix
By Noname - 21/02/2009 21:43 - United States
By ScreweD- - 16/11/2015 21:39 - United States - San Francisco
By tirf - 09/02/2015 22:58
By SMRT - 13/01/2010 06:08 - Canada
By Anonymous - 10/11/2009 06:43 - United States
mmm that staple sounds nice. do you have a picture?
it's a peer review. people aren't supposed to write "good job", they are supposed to point out problems and tell you how to get a better score.
Constructive criticism from a peer review? That's probably the best thing you could ask for, s'long as the suggestions were good ones. There's always room for improvement, and others can see flaws you may have overlooked.
The point of getting your work reviewed isn't to give you compliments. Heeding the criticism in order to improve your work is the point, and if you're not willing to do that you're not going to improve at whatever it is you are doing.
Bah, it's better than the peer review I got recently. I didn't put in quite so much work, but eventually my peer editor gave up trying to give any constructive criticism and just started writing in capital letters "WHAT???" and "This makes no sense!" and "FOCUS" and "You've lost me." I had no idea how to react to the peer review because only two of the five pages actually gave me advice on how to improve, the rest was just venting.
today, I had to read the lamest piece of shit ever put to paper, it did however have a very pretty blue staple attaching this crap together.
Ignore things like that, usually when a peer review happens half the people in the class room don't give a crap. Not many people will do a good peer review, most just half ass it.
Keywords
Colored staples are awesome. However, as long as whoever it was left constructive criticism, then you really have nothing to complain about. It can be hard to see something that you spent a lot of time on be unpopular, there are worse things. Not really an FML.
When I peer edit papers, I only pay attention to the things that are wrong. The purpose is to find places to make improvements. It isn't the editor's job to point out things you did well; that takes more of his or her time.