Party animal
By Laci - 30/04/2011 17:50 - United States
By Laci - 30/04/2011 17:50 - United States
By hnickell93 - 09/10/2012 01:55 - United States - Visalia
By Anonymous - 31/10/2009 19:40 - United Kingdom
By jimbop - 23/05/2009 17:48 - Canada
By toni405 - 21/07/2011 21:24 - United States
By SeatofIgnorance - 29/08/2017 04:30
By Anonymous - 02/11/2018 03:00
By theRoomie - 02/11/2009 06:47 - United States
By hedayk - 15/05/2015 20:26 - United States - Bronx
By Anonymous - 13/08/2020 14:01
By catt - 17/10/2014 20:12 - Germany - Berlin
*EXPERT INPUT*: Ok, I've noticed there are two types of comments on here: 1- The comments made by those who think that people in a relationship should be able to drink, and/or those people that think that people in relationships "can do what they please" and "dont have to worry about social consequences" and "should not be held accountable for their actions". In other words, mostly the feminists who take "female freedom" too far, to it including saying "women have a right to drink in excess without their fiance, put themselves in sketchy dangerous possible cheating situations, and even deserve to be able to cheat if they FEEL LIKE IT". These people are going to defend the OP to the death, saying she has 100% right to act unclassy, irresponsible, and be a huge partier and drinker without her fiance around (which is, in my opinion, the totally wrong thing to do). They think that her FIANCE did something TERRIBLY WRONG by jokingly splashing her in the water, and they call it "abusive". Why do they call it abusive? Because the feminazi's feel that she has a RIGHT to drink without her fiance, get splooshy drunk, and do all kinds of lascivious things on her own accord. They think she should NOT be held accountable. THEREFORE, THEY THINK THE MALE FIANCE HAS NO ROOM/RIGHT TO GET MAD AT HER, TO FROWN ON HER ACTIONS IN ANY WAY, AND LEAST OF ALL, TO PUNISH HER FOR THEM, EVEN IN A JOKING WAY. ============================= 2- The other type of people are the people who think people SHOULD be held accountable, people who think that both MEN AND WOMEN in relationships should act responsibly, do moral things and not betray their partner, and also people who DONT APPROVE OF DRINKING. These people are able to take a joke, and also understand WHY the male fiance was irritated/wanted to "teach her", bcuz these people BELIEVE THAT THE FEMALE (OP) DID SOMETHING WRONG BY GETTING SLOPPY. And if I were to give my personal opinion, id say the male fiance was in the right here.
:) I would severely hurt him
I'd give him head and right before things came to completion i'd pull his head over his **** and ask him how he likes it and then run away with the sound of creepy laughter to haunt him.
Bet hell be really supportive when you have morning sickness too... Dump him. Seriously.
what an asshole
I wonder what a "night of drinking" is in this case. Consider also that she could have had no more than two or three drinks, but could have had a bad reaction to them. I personally have consumed one glass of alcohol and then been unconscious for twelve to thirteen hours, with a horrid hangover and severe vomiting. As well, there is no reason to push her face into vomit and toilet water- even if she did drink too much. That would be alike to punching someone in their broken arm for being "stupid" enough to fall off of a bike or trampoline. The phrase "That'll teach ya!" implies that she is deserving of this degradation and unhappiness. Even if some crueler people may consider that to be true, it certainly isn't appropriate behaviour for a person whom is supposed to love her and take care of her for the rest of her life.
wtf is his problem... was he drunk too..?
dump the asshole
Keywords
what.the.****?
no, no u's havn't.