Thanks…
By Anonymous - 15/09/2012 18:34 - United States - Metairie
By Anonymous - 15/09/2012 18:34 - United States - Metairie
By Braxam - 15/06/2011 16:42 - United States
By Anonymous - 31/07/2009 17:01 - United States
By ohmygod582 - 14/04/2014 01:32 - United States - Gilbert
By Anonymous - 23/01/2010 08:05 - United States
By anon - 05/04/2017 04:00
By stabbed with kindness - 02/03/2013 21:44 - Russian Federation - Elektrostal
By Thithien1 - 01/04/2009 06:07 - Korea Republic of
By Lii - 24/03/2015 01:04 - United Kingdom - Birmingham
By Nicked - 25/04/2009 11:50 - Israel
By stupid - 27/05/2013 11:16 - Lithuania - Prienai
Why would your first reaction to someone tapping your shoulder be to assault them? I could understand jumping, or yelping, but actually attempting to attack them? Sweetheart, you need therapy for paranoia and aggression issues. If it's just because you're female, trust me, not everyone that touches your shoulder is some man trying to rape you. Take the spotlight off yourself for a second and think about it. How would you feel if you tried to get someone's attention, and they just punched the crap out of you? You deserved it, and I kind of hope karma pays the favor back to you someday. He probably won't be able to file charges, but hopefully he'll file a complaint against you, just to get this on the record if you try to hurt someone else...
Thanks, #59. Well worded.
I've known people who use "jumpiness" or "reflexes" just as an excuse to hit people with impunity. They love going to haunted house attractions.
That's fine, Levvy. Because people who enjoy hitting us at the House of Shock (new Orleans haunted house) get a lovely surprise. They get hit back and some charges on top. It's very much frowned upon here, to go to a place like that and claim 'jumpiness'.
I like this House of Shock place's attitude. I wish the place I worked at had that kind of spirit (though it was still otherwise fine - and I never got hit myself, thankfully).
Levvy- for a haunted house to have that sort of attitude, they have to somehow get a license to allow 'touching'. Most haunted houses don't have that ability. I really don't know how they acquired such a thing, but it's very nice at times like those.
"and whirled around to hit him in the crotch", what the **** is wrong with you?
You know, everyone on here says you're too paranoid and everything. Yeah I see that to a point but its better to be prepared. People are still violently murdered and raped EVERYWHERE. At least you're not pretending you live in a protective bubble because "that stuff just doesn't happen to people like me" thank the guy and go on. I give you credit for being at least alittle bit prepared.
I've been grabbed, shouted at and other things that made me feel uncomfortable. I do get a paranoid around men and honestly, when a guy comes up to me I am on guard and am thinking about what to do if things get ugly. However, I always wait to see what's actually going to happen before acting. Even if you feel something on your ass that doesn't necessarily mean a pervert - it could be someone accidentally brushing their bag against you or, at that height, very easily a child not looking where they were going.
At what cost? A little preparation goes a long way, but to the point that OP will blindly attack someone JUST because someone touched her? The touch wasn't aggressive nor sexual in the least. IT WAS A TAP ON THE SHOULDER! You can't fully trust everybody you meet in passing, nor even your neighbor. We get that. But seriously, use common sense and keep it in perspective. Not everyone is out to rape and torture and kill and eat you.
Kicking someone in the jimmies now equals "preparation", apparently. Boy, that song in The Lion King must have confused you with how few nutshots it involved.
No good deed goes unpunished.
When on average in western countries a third of women are sexually assaulted in their lifetime, being unexpectedly touched in public (whether it is a tap on the shoulder or otherwise) can be frightening. My first reaction wouldn't be to punch the guy behind me, but it would scare the bejeesus out of me.
If it would "scare the bejeesus" out of you to be tapped on the shoulder, then you should stay barricaded in your home, alone, because you are a crazy ass bitch. Oh, and I doubt that sexual assault statistic because, apparently, women can decide retroactively that they didn't want to have sex after being the aggressor as long as they have had a few drinks even if the guy was more drunk than the woman.
Shouldn't the point really be that the OP needs to be aware of her surroundings? We've all been guilty of getting distracted but if OP has earphones in how can she interact with people. The man was probably calling out to her and couldn't get her attention. Next time just make sure you are paying attention to what is going on around you, problem solved.
He could of walked into her field of vision waving his arms at her? She has eyes, ears aren't the only way to get someones attention.
It is scary when a stranger invades your personal space - at the least, it is startling. I don't think you should be blamed at all for striking out when you felt threatened, but I also don't think you should have your earphones in when you're walking down the street. It makes you a target, because you can't hear what's going on around you and people know that you have an item of value on you. So, no blame for lashing out, but slight concern about the lack of caution.
I would say the exact opposite. Earphones are fine - even when I have mine on loud I am still aware of my surroundings. And lashing out in the way OP did is not okay.
Sure, I don't blame someone for lashing out just because they become aware of the existence of others. If that someone happens to be a horse.
It depends on the earphones - when mine are in, I can't hear anything, which is why I don't use them walking around. I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that people look at this and see 'woman punched man in nuts' and avoid the whole 'woman startled by man when vulnerable'. I think the situation is her own fault, that if she couldn't keep track of her surroundings with her earphones in then she shouldn't have been wearing them, and that she should develop a better way of handling sudden surprises than punching someone below the belt. At the same time, I don't think someone, especially a person made vulnerable (be it by gender, or if they were disabled, or old, or if for any other reason they were disadvantaged physically or by social agreement) should be condemned for doing what they needed to feel safe. Yes, she was a bit of an idiot. Yes, she should tone down the attack in the future. But if he had been an attacker and not an unfortunate helpful person, and she didn't have any kind of defensive reflex, it could have been a very different story and it is a sad reality that those sort of situations are more common that anyone would like.
Or how about this: Start blasting peoples' genitals AFTER you confirm they're actually dangerous.
Why was your first reaction to hit the stranger in the crotch?
What if it were a female?
Did you even read the FML? "I was shocked and whirled around to hit HIM in the crotch"
Keywords
Why the hell would that be your first reaction? "Somebody tapped my shoulder - I'm gonna punch their nuts!"
You're way too paranoid