By Anonymous - 13/10/2012 23:42 - United Kingdom - Hemel Hempstead

Today, I was talking to my future mother-in-law about my upcoming wedding. She told me that I wasn't allowed to have the wedding at a church, nor wear a white dress, nor have roses for flowers, because that would mean I'd be "copying" her. FML
I agree, your life sucks 32 859
You deserved it 1 871

Same thing different taste

Top comments

She also forgot to mention that you're not allowed to invite your future mother-in-law to the wedding. That'd be copying her too.

wow. sheesh. something tells me she might not approve of you marrying her son. not your fault though, OP. FYL!

Comments

Mmmmm. This wedding sounds familiar...If I remember correctly she walked down the aisle too. Better avoid that.

bitch please. its my day not yours! i hope that was your response

bellatrix0805 2

So all the other women who had weddings at churches wore a white wedding dress and had roses are copying her as well??? What a bitch

Shadow_Phantom 26

Cause that's -so- original. *cough* Have your wedding the way you want it, disregard her, and don't invite her if she can't handle it like a grown woman.

timanddavelive 4

Time for you to stand up for yourself and let them know you're not a pushover or a welcome mat. Your wedding day is about YOU. Not them.

This is YOUR wedding day. **** what she thinks. Most weddings have white dresses, rose bouquets, and are located mostly in churches. This woman-Hitler needs to back the **** off and mind her own business.

ideasrule 13

I have to agree with your future mother-in-law. You'd be copying not only her, but hundreds of millions of other unoriginal, ridiculously expensive, materialistically oriented weddings around the world. That kind of wedding is as intrepid as the brainwashing institution they're held in.

So because that kind of wedding is unoriginal, ridiculously expensive and materialistically oriented, it's ok for the mother-in-law to forbid it? Didn't think so, mate.

perdix 29

#46, I admire your attempt at using big words, but I'm guessing you meant "insipid" instead of "intrepid." Someone's gotta help you along.

It could have been autocorrect. Also, since when is having a vocabulary a bad thing? "Insipid" isn't even a big (or complicated) word... But besides that, I totally agree. Even if OP "can't" have a traditional wedding, she's not really limited. There are plenty of other options...

perdix 29

#90, you've got me wrong. I'm all for big vocabularies and for people using them well. "Insipid" is not a big word, but it is an unusual one, and one that is not in typical use.

ideasrule 13

By contrast, I'm not for big vocabularies; I almost always prefer simplicity. However, English is not my first language, so I don't always know what words are common in everyday usage. Thanks for pointing out my mistake!

I'm sorry but if OP wants that kind of wedding u shouldn't be putting an opinion that goes against what she wants. it's just rude. if bitch slap a hoe if they told me they wished I'd do something different for my wedding.

ideasrule 13

Nobody's saying she can forbid it. I'm saying that the OP should really think up of something more original, something that will be memorable for its originality instead of just the fact that it's a wedding.

But why should OP really think up of something more original if her dream is the unoriginal one?

devore504 7
Llamacod 11

and probably will be for quite some time

Because she didn't even decide on that dream herself... She's probably not going with a traditional wedding because she just so happens to like roses, churches, and the color white. She most likely chose those things because she thinks that's what a wedding is supposed to look like. Now, she can go and have her wedding like that if she wants, and no one should be able to tell her not to, but others DO have a right to point out that it's uncreative and dull (although not in the way the mother-in-law did here.) Also, slapping someone for having an opinion? I'm an outspoken person, and if you ask me what I think of your wedding, I'm not afraid to tell you I think it's boring. It's nice to see that some brides are petty enough to resort to violence over that... If OP just considers all of the options she has other than a traditional wedding, she shouldn't be upset at all. Is it really such a big deal just because it's not an exact copy of Queen Victoria's (or whoever started the "traditional" wedding) wedding? Of course not.

thrAsHeRr9081 16

170 - I see your point, but that is not why this is a FML.

184, no, of course not. The FML is still valid because OP's mother-in-law shouldn't be telling her what to do. I'm just saying that WHAT the mother-in-law said isn't really a big deal. She kind of has a point, regardless of what reasoning she used to make it.

Don't let her ruin your wedding. Do as you please.