15- I think ur really beautiful

most of us do. but we aren't creepy staplers like you to announce itto the world and have that type of picture up.

stalkers**

im trying not to say something creepy

ha ha staplers. =]

I agree, Leayna, why can some people take pride of that kind of thing? I mean, fair enough, she got the guy she wanted, but she made him cheat to get it. I don't get why people want to have a relationship with someone that they started out cheating with, I mean, doesn't that just suggest that they'll have no issues cheating on you in the future if the right persuasion comes along? OP, kick him out, don't even give him a choice - he's already made it by getting her pregnant. If you ever look back, make sure it's to remember the revenge you will get on him.

88, My thoughts exactly.

wow I totally agree with that well said.

I agree too. I don't see why people don't just break up with the person they're with if they're going to cheat anyways. Its messed up.

Agreed, Cinn— I don't see the attraction of an already married man. Cheating DOES happen quite often, though, and there's a huge double standard. After our engagement, I wasn't hit on nearly as much, but since our wedding, my husband gets hit on much more often than he was while single. IMO, it's gotta be a ring thing. I've heard it said a wedding ring shows other single women that a man's not afraid of committment; married fathers are even better because they're not afraid of kids. I could understand that as an initial attraction, especially if he declines any advances. It *seems* like his eventual cheating, should he cave, would blow that theory out of the water, though. Unfortunately, many homewreckers are very capable of convincing themselves (or being convinced) that the poor clueless spouse deserves it by the time cheating actually occurs. Logic gets thrown out the window when hormones/sexual chemistry kicks in. Depressing and pathetic, but true. >__<

except the kitchen-

why? they're hilarious.

omg no it's not, it's twisted. I would have spilt her skull with a pan and snipped his balls off with fancy kitchen scissors :3 I can imagine it on criminal minds now... (: "yes the make victim's cod was bleeding out through the nut sack"

It looks like #89's victim.... *puts on sunglasses* ...just doesn't have the balls. YEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!

idc what you think, its ******* hilarious.

94 Actually I was thinking she was being nice. I would have knocked the guy out for later, beat the woman 'til she passed out/miscarried, then moved on to the guy. At that point, I would either get him hard, then break it, or snip his balls off. Then I would be happy. :)

94 Actually I was thinking she was being nice. I would have knocked the guy out for later, beat the woman 'til she passed out/miscarried, then moved on to the guy. At that point, I would either get him hard, then break it, or snip his balls off. Then I would be happy. :) **** you, anti-flood.

94 Actually I was thinking she was being nice. I would have knocked the guy out for later, beat the woman 'til she passed out/miscarried, then moved on to the guy. At that point, I would either get him hard, then break it, or snip his balls off. Then I would be happy. :) **** you, anti-flood.

Your picture is awesome

It's not the baby's fault. Use punctuation.

Agreed with 53. I had to read your comment twice to fully understand what you were stating. >_>

24 - lose some weight. I don't understand fatties

Why would you kill the baby? It's not the cheating prick. And although the woman is trashy for sleeping with a man who's engaged, the fiance was the one who betrayed her and humiliated her all in one. I say out of the three, kill him.

Dick.

I had to read it 5+ times to even partially understand it.

I wonder if the mistress tried to get the cheating fiance to do it that way so she could watch. If she enjoyed watching it that much I mean.