By oregongrl1991 - 29/01/2010 03:32 - France
Same thing different taste
For better, for worse
By limegreengiraffe - This FML is from back in 2014 but it's good stuff - United States - Lubbock
Doomed
By SweptWolf - 06/06/2020 23:02
By almost broke - 21/02/2016 13:24 - Czech Republic - Brno
By badluck - 21/07/2014 19:31 - Canada - Medicine Hat
By nolongerengaged - 03/02/2009 17:08 - United States
By Anonymous - 20/12/2014 20:00 - United States - Framingham
Hot headed
By Anonymous - 27/06/2024 17:00 - United States
Stuck on amber
By Anonymous - 06/03/2021 16:58
By 34_22_34 - 28/07/2010 19:27 - United States
Not the one
By LOSER - 23/05/2022 00:00
Top comments
Comments
YDI for being materialistic. You can get married without a ring.
er...isn't this off that 70's show? It sounds eerily close..
...
So..why exactly aren't you engaged any more? Just because you no longer have the ring? Or is it because he pushed the financial responsibility for the ring he (presumably) started paying for onto you? If it's the former...it's very good that you're not engaged. Calling it off simply because the ring might have needed to go is childish and immature. A ring is not necessary for a couple to be engaged. Yes, it's a nice gesture, but it is not necessary. I don't really care if my boyfriend gives me a ring when he proposes; the proposal itself will be enough. I'll find a ring I already own to wear on my finger, if he cannot afford one. I'd love it if he got me a ring, I'd absolutely love it, but we're both poor and understand that food and rent comes before jewelry. If it's the latter...I'd say just leave him completely. A man who shoves off his financial responsibility onto his woman because he doesn't know how to budget is no sort of man at all. It's fine to plan BEFORE getting the ring that you two will have joint responsibility for the costs...but him dumping it on you like that is just irresponsible and rude. He needs to learn to not live beyond his means, and to at least ATTEMPT to plan for changes in income.
You're a dumbass for thinking you need a ring to be engaged. Way to be another materialistic **** in this society who needs something flashy to validate herself and her relationship. FAIL
Wow you are a bit materialistic. You don't need an engagement ring to be engaged BTW. Many couples do not have that. If you love him, a ring won't matter and you'll tell him that. Save up for a HOUSE, a CAR, something worthwhile instead of a ring on a finger. And you can get a decently priced wedding bands you just have to know where to look.
My fiance got my engagement ring and wedding band for 700. It was about 1,000 then on sale then 15% off luxury items then he talked them down. It is all about finding the sale, they are out there. Or try a cubic zirconium! They look the same, but cost less. You would never know the difference. Besides, as long as your in love what else matters really.
Keywords
That sucks, but I have to admit that his approach was a smart way to get out of an engagement without ending the relationship.
My husband didn't get me a ring. I have my Great Grandmothers diamond, and my mom bought my wedding band as my wedding gift. Difference is, my husband was just poor... not a jerk who dangles something like that in front of you and then yanks it away. Dump his ass.