By argh - 03/03/2012 00:14 - Australia
Same thing different taste
By gabxoxo03 - 10/06/2011 19:06 - United States
By Anonymous - 16/08/2009 23:33 - United States
Tension
By Anonymous - 06/04/2011 11:47 - Netherlands
By Anonymous - 28/05/2017 20:00
By Anonymous - 02/02/2014 17:33 - United States - Far Rockaway
By Anonymous - 18/11/2013 18:53 - United Kingdom - Congleton
By Anonymous - 03/08/2011 17:03 - United States
By backstabbed - 29/10/2011 07:22 - Australia
By Anonymous - 16/05/2012 20:34 - Netherlands - Kerkrade
By leeceetaylor99 - 15/07/2013 16:47 - United States - San Antonio
Top comments
Comments
Hahaha god I'm so glad I don't have to worry about "sneaking" out!
I wonder what it is that makes people so angry about grammar and spelling.
We like to sound intelligent, and we also don't like to have to decipher garbled "attempts" at English for meaning? It's the same sort of reason anyone would want to be CORRECT at anything.
Snuck is a correct p.p of sneak, even Jennifer Gardner questioned Conan o'Brian once and boy, is she wrong
now I'm left wondering which is the right grammar! ah, shake my head.
lol, ok, everyone says "Snuck" but i've never heard "Snack". your friend is the idiot.
Your boyfriend seems like a pleasure to be around!
Today, I know past particle of sneak exist both snuck and sneaked. American and Canadian use snuck. But in dictionary, sneaked is correct.
technically you are both right. Snuck is more of a dialectal thing. In Scotland, instead of saying told (as in.. I told you so) many of us say telt. Although for us that's probably something to do with Gaelic because tell and told are irregular present/past tense, whilst Gaelic uses a regular past tense (the word for swimming is also the word for swam for example). But yeah, both are acceptable.
Keywords
Both are acceptable. "Snuck" is more common, in my experience. It's like "hung" and "hanged." Hung was actually added to the dictionary later, as many people thought "hanged" sounded awkward and improper.
I agree with the boyfriend