By notinflammable - 27/06/2009 04:41 - United States
Same thing different taste
By FMLFMLFMLFML - 29/05/2009 17:52 - United States
By ilovesocks - 20/01/2010 06:17 - United States
It's getting hot in here…
By pmek - 26/03/2012 09:11 - Australia - Collingwood
What? Why?
By Anonymous - 16/07/2024 05:00 - United States - Bakersfield
She's electric
By nnniii - 16/11/2015 04:55 - United States - Seattle
Love is love
By SpiderMan - 12/03/2009 00:23 - United States
By blocked_by_fire - 17/04/2012 18:13 - United States - Pullman
By batsu - 27/01/2012 06:48 - Canada
By Colton - 20/12/2011 02:29 - United States
Testing, testing
By BubbaYoshi117 - 07/01/2020 20:00 - United States - Kirkland
Top comments
Comments
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Everyone does stupid shit somtimes! but that had got to be the dumbest of all!! but so very funny!
I was waiting to see how long it would take before someone suggested that.
This arises many questions in my mind. 1. Why do men jack off into socks? 2. Does the OP know what inflammable means? If so, did he think the sperm would catch fire and burn up, or ignite like kerosene? If not, did he think semen was somehow immune to catching on fire? 3. He was so "excited" that he lit a fire? 4. Did the OP think the sock, soaked with semen, had been made flame-retardant? OR, did he think the semen would make the sock light up like some kind of sparkler, thus why he was excited? 5. Why did he wave the sock around to stop the fire? Shouldn't you stomp something out when it's on fire, or cover it with a blanket, or pour water on it, or do almost anything but wave it around? Answers to these mysteries will be greatly appreciated.
umm hun inflammable means relatively the same thing as flammable.. it can be lit on fire. Learn your vocab and maybe you won't get into situations like these
Has anyone else seen the words 'inflammable' and 'flammable' way too much, yet?
yeah...you're an idiot.
"Flammable" and "inflammable" mean basically the same thing. There are two "in" prefixes which are spelled the same. One means the same as "non-", or "un-", the opposite of what the word would mean without the prefix. The other is related to the stand-alone preposition "in", as in "inflammable", able to burst INTO flame. Why both words exist in the English language is beyond me, but since they do, might as well learn what they mean. :-p
Pseudo intellectuals in here sure like restating things said hundreds of comments ago.
Keywords
why on earth did you think this was a good idea in the first place?
You know that "flammable" and "inflammable" mean the same thing right? Inflammable things catch fire???