Follow my lead
By RayniDae - 15/06/2016 20:08 - United States - Port Clinton
By RayniDae - 15/06/2016 20:08 - United States - Port Clinton
By leanne - 16/12/2020 17:58 - United States - Denver
By 911 - 13/11/2008 03:57 - France
By Employee - 07/08/2012 19:17 - United States - Lincoln
By nearly a crazy lady - This FML is from back in 2013 but it's good stuff - United Kingdom
By haileelouxxx - 22/08/2014 12:05 - Australia - Brisbane
By -- - 04/09/2011 16:42 - Canada
By Roostermann25 - 31/05/2016 01:34 - United States - Lebanon
By Yudith - 04/06/2019 02:00
By Nill - 31/07/2023 03:00
By firecrotch - 04/06/2010 05:36 - United States
Chicken.
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayI'm assuming the thought of imagining her boss' lady parts was the first gross out. The second gross out is imagining that touching any lady parts as similar to handling raw chicken...
Touching yourself satisfies you - getting satisfied from touching a chicken would gross me out
Where do you work....that's not quite sanitary
9 months ago I was a cook at KFC for 2 and a half years and wearing gloves isn't mandatory. The. Proper procedure is to bread up with your hands as log as you scrub and clean them real good.
Touching yourself is not sanitary?
Ahhhh the health code violations!!
And sexual harassment
If you use proper cleaning techniques, you don't need to wear gloves. Even if you wear gloves at a job where you handle food, you should still be using proper washing techniques. Most places that serve food do not require you to wear gloves while handling food.
im not sure where you live but thats a universal law pretty much anywhere in the us
Really? I've worked in the food service for 5 years and every restaurant I've ever worked at has required people handling food (ESPECIALLY raw chicken) to wear gloves.
Anything that can get on hands can get on gloves.
That is not a health code violation. Safe serve standard prefer the use of gloves, but as long the bare hands are washed, and the food will be cooked after being handled with bare hands, it is still considered safe.
Besides, just wearing gloves doesn't make things clean. If you wear gloves then touch something then touch the food, it's the same as not wearing gloves at all, except you'd have to change gloves. As long as they're maintaining sanitation of their hands, it's typically cleaner than when people use gloves. I've seen people things all over while wearing gloves and not change them. I'd rather someone washing their hands repetitively and ensuring they're clean rather than letting them do who knows what while wearing gloves.
That's quite funny tho xD
Must be mcdonalds
Op isn't eating raw chicken. Salmonella doesn't get in to the body through touch. As long as hands are thoroughly washed before anything else is touched I don't see an issue.
That's unsanitary. You can get sick, isn't that a health violation?
9 months ago I was a cook at KFC for 2 and a half years and wearing gloves isn't mandatory. The. Proper procedure is to bread up with your hands as log as you scrub and clean them real good.
All you need to do is wash your hands.
Does a chicken have lips?
Nope its a **** after all.
No, that's a rooster not a chicken.
Good point. It could be the difference between an inappropriate joke for the workplace and sexual harassment.
Keywords
Where do you work....that's not quite sanitary
Ahhhh the health code violations!!