The cost of living crisis
By Noname - 12/03/2009 00:09 - United States
By Noname - 12/03/2009 00:09 - United States
By Anonymous - 17/05/2009 03:13 - United States
By copmagnet - 15/10/2010 00:43 - United States
By Anonymous - 13/08/2010 14:16 - United States
By River - 26/02/2009 16:17 - United States
By Criminal - 13/07/2010 23:15 - United States
By Anonymous - 04/02/2023 04:00 - United States
By Anonymous - 20/05/2009 06:07 - United States
By imnotcool - 16/04/2009 05:08 - United States
By corfan01 - 05/10/2009 11:11 - United States
By faeliality - 16/04/2017 16:00
A stop sign is not a suggestion.
LMAO. sue the cops and say u have OCD xD
OCD would probably cause a driver to stop multiple times at a stop sign, it would not make a person run the stop sign.
Dear genius, You did not pay $200 for a hilighter. You paid $200 for recklessy endangering lives. You didn't only put your own dumb ass in harm's way, but anyone else's who may have happened by. When you can rise above the laws of physics, feel free to ignore traffic controls. Until then, you should know that the last person who had an accident with me because they were too "important" to follow the rules was uninjured by the accident but not so lucky in the aftermath.
I heard that blue highlighters are actually the best color to help you remember what you highlight.
no you spent $200 because you didn't stop at a stop sign
You probably should have stopped at the stop sign. Who goes out to the store to buy another highlighter just because they don't like the colour of the one they have, anyway? Waste of gas. Thanks for killing my planet (not to mention wasting your own money on such a pointless trip).
Ditto #67
No you spent $200 for failing to stop. Next time be more patient.
Keywords
That is a ****** up idea of causality. You got a ticket because you failed to obey the law, the highlighters had nothing to do with it.
You probably should have obeyed Traffic laws than worry about petty things. You could have hurt someone.