What exactly do you mean?

Oh wow, thats interesting (and weird). Why is that the case though? Is it a waste spilling it on the ground? Lol.

It is because you are killing innocents and the children of God

Spilling your seeds on the ground has nothing to do with masturbation as some bible beaters may lead you to believe. It was about Onan being rebellious and not doing his duty according to custom of giving his dead brother's wife a child. (That's ****** up in itself).

It also says something about it's better to get married than to be sinful. I quoted it when explaining to people that if Christians are going to say "oh, the bible tells us..." then they should read it and actually know that sex shouldn't be frowned at. I know a few people that apparently are going to get married. The lady still believes that she's only going to have sex for reproductive purposes... There are nowords for my disbelief of this statement.

The Bible doesn't define marriage deeply or go into when is the right time to have sex. Most Christians believe that one should be legally married first before having as much crazy sex as you want. Which is actually a good idea, the waiting. It saves a lot of grief and trauma. But to decide when is the right time, you'd have to know what marriage is defined as. Marriage isn't the material objects or the ceremony, but the couples commitment to one another and to God in love and patience etc. That woman in the FML is crazy for thinking laying in a bed means sex was going to happen. I'm Christian and honestly there is nothing wrong with laying in a bed, from a Biblical stand point. That woman is just nuts!

Oh and 16- that "quote" is actually not anywhere in the Bible. Someone decided to make it up, probably long ago, about the story of Onan in Genesis 38. But no where does it actually say anything like that.

31, please tell me that that was sarcasm.

What if you get a divorce with your husband? won't that cause trauma and suffering? What if he's terrible at sex? o3o

Such bad nun puns! Love it!

Voodoo sex is so wrong, but it feels so right.

My mind is telling me no, but my body, my body is telling me yes.

Beware the teleporting penis.

Actually, my boyfriend just goes ahead and does them if we're just hanging around and not doing anything important. Hell, sometimes I do them if he and his roommate haven't done them all yet (and they VERY rarely have an empty sink).

I think he meant "What kind of guy does dishes instead of spending time with his girlfriend on Christmas?" and it just came off badly, but I could be wrong. But it's still a thoughtful thing to do to take care of the dishes.

Exactly. Unless you have a poly-cotton fetish, of course.

#23, and so is bacon, and you have to be pretty food at sex to beat that ;)

If I'm going to hell, I'm going for sex and bacon cheeseburgers, not for mixed fibre clothing. The pit of mixed fibre-wearers must be the most dull pit ever.

Good thing polycotton blends and bacon are only illegal in Judaism

Maybe she cooked dinner and he was being a gentleman by cleaning up?

She was at his home, chances are everything was in place prior to the dinner... even if she cooked, it's better she loiters in the kitchen and keep him company. My opinion! You don't have to agree!

Not sexist. She really could've helped out, whether it was her mess or not. The feminist movement was meant to create equality with the sexes, not to make rules that benefit just women. She can work too.

For some reason I don't think this FML had anything to do with her boyfriend being her slave. Some people feel more comfortable cleaning their own house and not having their guest do it. I feel like it's sexist to think she should be helping out because of the "feminist movement".

I'm 99.9% positive I made no mention of slavery. I wouldn't let my girlfriend do the dishes too, but it doesn't look/sound good if I'd be all alone in the kitchen doing the dishes while the girlfriend is picking her teeth with tooth pick on my bed (prolly OP?! no? nvm then). Okay look at it this way, if OP's boyfriend's madre wasn't hardcore anti-fappist, and OP and bf were engaged and then after dinner, instead of just watching le bf, being in the kitchen at that dish washing moment (even if she's not assisting, just being around in the kitchen), she proceeds to his bedroom, good impression? I think not, the thing with first impressions is that you only get to make one! Now I know the scenarios are a tad different but my analogy is a macrocosm of the situation. This is one of the things that drives mother-in-laws nuts. But to reiterate what I said earlier, purely my own opinion, you are not to concur forcefully!

Fornication means sex outside of marriage. This is not the reason that religions are stupid -- it's why they are no fun.

29 there are people not just Christians who participate in it and they haven't died so I think they're doing just fine; but calling religion stupid is completely ignorant.

Actually, there is probably a good reason why religions have taught that unmarried sex is taboo, from a common sense stand point of view. Historically, children born out of wedlock seem to live lives that are more difficult, in many respects, than peers that were born to married couples. It also seems that there would more legal protection for kids with married parents. Makes sense to me.

96, now we have a little something called contraception.