By xmelissadavisx - 28/11/2015 12:21
Same thing different taste
By elfy2 - 03/03/2011 02:49
Ralph and Huey
By wookieewhosshe - 12/06/2022 15:00 - United Kingdom - Dalkeith
By kstaa - 10/02/2010 11:47 - Australia
By herzausstein - 21/12/2009 22:36 - Belgium
By now have a cat - 24/04/2014 20:52 - United States - Glenview
By -.- - 20/09/2013 23:58 - United States - Lakeside
Lightweight
By Anonymous - 30/06/2023 18:00
Banished
By Anonymous - 25/11/2023 20:00
By Anonyme - 24/04/2014 06:57 - France - Aix-en-provence
By M.L. - 06/09/2009 21:09 - United States
Top comments
Comments
Better to have no lunch than to be covered in vomit!
I'm hoping you meant "than"
Ya sure...
When she just doesn't get grammar lol
Oh I 'get' grammar. Just sick and tired of people nitpicking every little mistake people make!
Except those two sentences are very different. "Then to be covered in vomit" means you got no lunch and somebody puked on you afterwards which would be a lot worse than this FML.
Well by the time I realized my mistake I was no longer able to correct it. But I'm sure people understand what I was getting at
Usually I hate the grammar nitpickers too, but that one was kinda funny.
Even though he puked on your lunch, it was a nice thing to do op!
It's better to have to buy lunch than be covered in vomit, and he will no doubt be incredibly grateful
Oh throw up you can buy new food.
Very nice of you, you're very empathetic. Sorry about your lunch
It's sort of romantic—you guys both lost your food at the same time.
This could be the gross start to a beautiful romance
I hope you didn't eat your lunch anyways.
YDI for being so absent-minded but you are still a good person.
At least OP didn't grab someone else's bag.
Despite the fact you may have had to buy your lunch, it was very kind of you to do that. :)
How kind of you! I'd have probably moved...
Keywords
Even though he puked on your lunch, it was a nice thing to do op!
Better to have no lunch than to be covered in vomit!