Rash decision
By caiti - 06/08/2009 01:25 - United States
By caiti - 06/08/2009 01:25 - United States
By Crunchy - 19/04/2009 21:52 - United States
By Anonymous - 07/02/2021 21:30
By Anonymous - 07/06/2012 18:09 - United States - Charlotte
By bleeding - 06/12/2009 01:24 - United States
By Sod's Law in action - 17/03/2018 01:30
By Anonymous - 12/12/2009 09:28 - United States
By racoonface - 19/04/2009 15:17 - United States
By Anonymous - 12/12/2011 20:23 - United States
By Cody - 30/12/2008 09:35 - France
By boo - 27/05/2009 18:15 - United States
Should have used some concealer or something so you don't look like you shoot up meth.. Not the brightest decision.
SO just explain that you have poison sumac!?!?! GOD why are people on this website so ******* dumb
WHY ARE YOU SO ******* DUMB FOR REPLYING TO THE FIRST COMMENT JUST TO BE SEEN ON TOP YOU ATTENTION HOGGING PIECE OF SHIT here, i did something different by yelling at some one who replied, not the OP. as always, give me your opinions on my post
what if she wants to look like a junkie it might get her hired!! lol
YDI for having anal intercourse and giving yourself AIDS you ******* ******.
YDI for having cooties
Seriously, #9 you have no life. Stop thinking you're funny, original, or remotely funny. Because you are none of those things. So #9; FYL.
**** people are stupid. A) explain the situation B) wear a long sleeve shirt to avoid the whole problem Jesus H.
The idiots saying "just explain it and all is fiiine" need to stop living in Carebear land, for crap's sake. If someone who looks like an obvious junkie went and told you they just look that way for some odd reason, would you believe them?? Especially on a job interview? Would you risk YOUR job in this economy, in the random chance the obvious might not be true and the apparent bullsh*t excuse might be the truth? Of course not. At least, no recruiter would. So yes, the OP is dumb for not hiding the marks, but explaining would certainly not be a fail proof solution. They might not have believed OP anyway.
YDI for not covering it up before the interview.. No one wnats to see that sh**!
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayThat's a poisonous plant dumbass!
A good point? Possibly. Terrible spelling and grammar? Yes.
you should have paid closer attention in English class.
Yeah, you could've worn longer sleeves, or maybe tried some concealer? I suppose you could've also tried to explain to her about the rash, but she probably wouldn't have believed you anyway...so yeah fyl.
I second this; although it's more of a YDI than a FML. You could have done multiple things to explain (or hide) these markings.
You could've done any of the suggestions from above. Or simply explain what happened. I can't think of one place that would dismiss a person like that. That's why I'm thinking this is a fake.
Yes obviously no employer in the ENTIRE United States would ever consider doing that, clever deduction skills.
*high fives #67, if fed up of the idiocy of "explain and everything is all fine!"* Like people would have believed so easily...
YDI - if you have something that awkward/obvious then wear long sleeves. You might've been hot for an hour or so, but at least you'd have a job.
YOU DESERVE IT. You had so many options: just SAY something, wear longer sleeves, make up... so if you made NO effort, you deserve it! hahahhahah!!
It's not OP's fault the interviewer jumped to conclusions.
Keywords
Yeah, you could've worn longer sleeves, or maybe tried some concealer? I suppose you could've also tried to explain to her about the rash, but she probably wouldn't have believed you anyway...so yeah fyl.
You shouldn't work at a place that would jump to 'rash' decisions like your interviewer did.