No thanks, Karen
By artdegreemyass - 21/07/2012 21:14 - United States - West Palm Beach
By artdegreemyass - 21/07/2012 21:14 - United States - West Palm Beach
By maleficunt - 03/06/2014 20:44 - United Kingdom - Cannock
By Anonymous - 28/12/2014 00:22 - United Kingdom - London
By zanaruka - 19/05/2020 05:00
By jesuscrip - 18/02/2016 06:08 - United States - Orrville
By fuck you walmart - 26/04/2013 22:03 - United States
By Anonymous - 22/06/2013 20:55 - United States
By diablo - 23/05/2018 19:00
By no i'm sure you're a responsible parent - 09/04/2020 02:00 - United States
By Anonymous - 25/04/2013 19:37 - United States - Norcross
By notadoorman - 25/07/2014 18:16 - United States - Elmont
What does that have to do with the first amendment?
YDI for thinking other money isn't dirty. BTW, Americans should get over their herpes phobia. Most people are infected, only 10% get cold sores and only 1% have more serious problems.
Handling fresh blood/pus is more likely to transmit the disease to you. Common sense.
That doesn't really matter. You only have a 1/500 chance of contracting HIV from sleeping unprotected with an infected person, just because its low risk DOESN'T mean its worth the risk. You can NEVER know if you're one of the unlucky people who is severely affected by the Herpes virus (whether its cold sores, skin sores or worse genital herpes) so its best not to touch other people's fresh bodily fluid when you can see they are visibly ill.
This reminds me of my Biology class where a kid wiped his cold sore germs on another kid. (I'm in high school by the way.) My teacher started screaming from the back of the room, "Connor stop trying to give Stephan herpes!!"
How is that the first amendment
Keywords
There's nothing in the first amendment about not accepting herpes-infected money.
Just walk away. Just walk away.