By Anonymous - 19/04/2012 04:46 - United States - Sparks
Same thing different taste
The reviews are in
By Anonymous - 23/04/2014 07:17 - United States - Rapid City
National bard
By bad poet - 02/12/2013 01:57 - United States - Millerton
Booksmart
By Angry Bookworm - 28/12/2022 09:00
Reading skills
By yudencow - 18/09/2019 18:00
By WishIWasAWriter - 08/09/2011 18:03 - United Kingdom
Help!
By technicallywroteabook - 21/08/2015 05:15 - United States - Grapevine
By Apparently not a writer - 20/02/2013 16:36 - United States - Hockessin
We got a reader!
By Anonymous - 28/09/2012 05:18 - United States - Hobbs
By snappyPi - 28/01/2011 06:21
The early bird gets the worm!
By WhatADickens - 20/01/2018 19:00
Top comments
Comments
Your next novel should be about an oversensitive writer that slowly, cruelly, and methodically destroys the lives of those who have been critical. Then ask them again what they think about it.
What's it about?
Although it is humorous to read, your friends were harsh about evaluating your work. I'm not saying that they should have lied and told you that they like it, but constructive criticism would have been a much better option. The way you put it, OP, your friends sound like insensitive assholes.
If more than one person said it then u should probably consider the possibility that it actually might suck and they weren't lying...
Well since they aren't very helpful, I would suggest looking at these things: 1) Punctuation, if you aren't good at punctuation, writing a good book will be incredibly difficult for you. 2) The first sentence. The very first sentence has to make the person interested so these are recommended: a minor sentence, a one word paragraph, onomatopoeia, a well written dramatic sentence or actions which can make the situation seem dangerous which can either be achieved by starting at the end of the book and jumping back in time, starting off with a chase scene or making a safe situation appear dangerous and reveal it isn't. Not recommended: A name as the first word, a dull sentence with boring day to day actions only, description of the setting or character. 3) The amount of description. Several people make the mistake of giving too much description which can honestly turn a brilliant book into mind-numbing drivel which I have seen in multiple books sadly. You don't need to describe every single location nearby in excruciating detail, you only need to describe, in a fair quantity of detail, the important locations and give vague descriptions of unimportant locations they will only be at for a few pages. 4) Characters. Mixing too many characters into one story will make it boring AND confusing for people so you have to limit the main characters to 6 or below. Also, supporting characters shouldn't just disappear into the abyss, use the ones you establish, don't bring in 500. I have seen books make this mistake and it has made me extremely confused because I don't remember who R is when they only appeared in page 213 and then it focuses on S, S2, S3, T, R2, Q, R3, D, D2 and L before suddenly bringing R back in page 402. 5) Word choice. Look up synonyms of words you know that you use too frequently because a varied vocabulary is required to make a good book. 6) Genre. Don't try to cram all genres into one book, you need to pick one and focus on it, some others will get mixed in as the book progresses depending on how you write it but you can't try to mix in everything. 7) Consistency. You can't suddenly conjure up a dragon in a book that states there is no magic and no dragons 5 pages ago.
Er, this isn't a writing forum; this is FML. We haven't seen the work; we can't dole out suggestions when we haven't read it. Your post, the suggestions, might not be relevant. Who are we to know? Your advice on punctuation is a mite hypocritical, seeing as how your use is lacking at best. Judging from this post, your vocabulary isn't varied either. I focus on a whole cornucopia of genres. I haven't been gifted a single critique telling me I should not. I know a plethora of writers who focus on more than one at a time, as well. I'm, uh, not a minority. And yes, contrary to your statement, I can conjure up a dragon in a world with no magic and no dragons. It's called a hallucination. It's called surrealism. It's called being a good enough writer where you can drop things in such as that without jeopardizing the story's consistency. I understand you were trying to be helpful, but, to me, you came off a tad bit pretentious. Pretentious, if not downright arrogant.
Well that's rude! Ask them to not be so blunt next time.
Well I guess you can't be to mad at them for not lying to you, although they were to blunt they could of said it in a better way. Perhaps you should re-write your book and show it to your friends again.
Keywords
But aquarium gravel is tough and gritty! If your novel is a mystery, I think that was a great compliment. Wait a second...it's also really disgusting and slimy and smells like dead fish...
Aquarium gravel? Sniffing boot polish? In that case, I suggest you write erotic literature instead..