By cemakara3 - 12/03/2016 20:07 - Denmark - Vallensb?k

Spicy
Today, I had sex for the first time. Now my girlfriend won't talk to me because I don't think she is pretty enough since I "wanted it to be over so fast". FML
I agree, your life sucks 22 240
You deserved it 3 076

cemakara3 tells us more.

Hey OP here. I showed my gf some of the comments on here and she is not mad anymore. Thanks!!

Top comments

Even if it weren't just biology, that seems like backwards logic. "You just came? You must think I'm hideous!"

CheekyRaccoon 27

It's still better than her asking, are you in yet? Practice makes perfect.

Comments

43, you're having some really terrible sex.

Does she know it was your first time?

Um, I'm pretty sure there's specific derogatory terms that are used to refer to women that just spread their legs and lay there during sex, which greatly convey that they are not considered good at sex. "Dead ****," "Dead fish."

She DOES realize you wouldn't have even been able to get it up if you didn't find her attractive, right?

That's completely false. Just because someone has an erection does not mean they're sexually or sexually attracted to anything. Erections can be a fear or stress response.

It is not "completely" false. And I'm aware other things cause them. I'm just saying it's to his credit that he likely would have had a hard time becoming aroused if he didn't think she was attractive. Get out of here with your high and mighty attitude.

How was that a high and mighty attitude? I was pointing out that your comment was wrong and I didn't even do it in a rude way. It's shitty to put it out that there just someone gets an erection means that they're attracted to whatever is going on is a toxic mindset that needs to be abolished. THAT ^ would have been a high and mighty comment. And just because you find someone attractive doesn't mean you'll automatically get an erection. Stress can cause erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation.

I never said that. I never once said that anything that causes an erection means that the person in question is attracted to it. You are putting words in my mouth in an attempt to make me sound bad. Newsflash: it's not going to work. Stop twisting my words to try and "win." And again, I acknowledged the fact that other things cause it. You're just deliberately ignoring my points now, so I'm done wasting my time and effort on you. If the last word is what you wanted, feel free to have it.

I wasn't trying to twist your words. I wasn't trying to make you sound bad. I was bringing up legitimate points about why it's not always the best to equate an erection with attraction. And I meant my comments about what causes erections as more of a general PSA because some people don't realize that erections can be a fear, stress, or any other type of emotional response. I know when I was younger I thought erection meant attraction and consent on the man's part which led to some very toxic thinking and victim blaming. I thought maybe one person would be interested and go educate themselves on the subject and not be the shitty person I was years ago.

#81 - I appreciate your effort. People often forget, or just don't know, that erections happen for other reasons. It's one of the main reasons male rape victims get victim blamed, mocked and discredited. Idk why the other commenter took it personally when you were just giving some general info which needs to be shared more. Don't feel bad. (:

Thanks! Honestly it's probably a combination of them having a bad day and me not explaining my point clearly. Glad you understood though :)

Again, I clarified multiple times that I understood their point. Not sure why you people don't seem capable of reading. Also, it's not that I took it personally. I just don't quite get how I can clarify the fact that I understand and accept something so many times and still be accused of not doing so.

To both of you, let me just make one last comment: just because I provide a counter-argument, that doesn't mean I don't understand what is being said. I can accept another person's point as valid and still try to clarify my own point without it cancelling out the understanding of said other point. The fact that you two- and clearly a handful of other people who have been voting down all my comments - seem to think I am denying 81's points just because I offered my own as well tells me that none of you understand that it's possible to have a discussion with someone and disagree with them. Apparently I must mindlessly accept and agree with everything the other person says and never think for myself in order to be met with any sort of intelligent or mature response. In short, yes, I do understand what 81 was trying to say. Yes, I do accept that they have valid points. But so did I. If you don't choose to agree with that, fine. But don't treat me like an idiot for trying to make my own point clear.

43, you are either a virgin making assumptions, or just terrible at sex. Either way, I feel bad for you.

#43; it doesn't make you cool or edgy to put other women down it just makes you someone who needs to grow up.

also adults who've had any sexual experience at all know for it to be enjoyable both parties have to do their part and if one doesn't... well they probably won't go back for seconds. the only people who lie back and do nothing (or believe women do in general) are those who got their knowledge from movies and jokes and ****. it's a shame because there are so many positive ways to teach people about sex and they're rarely used.

Oh god. Let her know it's a compliment to how sexy she is!!

Dont tell her anything, if she wants to be self conscious and rude after what should have been an important experience thats her problem. Its rare to hear about a guy lasting very long his first time. And im sure theres about to be 50 comments on this from **** star wannabees saying they went like 4 hours or something ridiculous their first time but ignore them...they lie. :)