By animalover - 13/08/2009 16:49 - United States
Same thing different taste
By vstan - 25/08/2010 00:48 - United States
WOOF!
By Dweeb - 02/10/2019 18:00
Save the doggo
By JC - 19/10/2009 06:40 - United States
No turkey for you
By Anonymous - 30/11/2024 10:00 - United States - Allentown
Murderer!
By Puppy_Killer - 16/12/2020 23:02 - Australia
Road rage
By fUcKOAHdSAjl - 16/08/2013 18:41 - United States - Manchester
By anonymous - 21/05/2010 17:26 - United States
By frame - 20/03/2009 15:08 - Canada
By prettyinpurple - 10/02/2009 04:54 - United States
By GoodDog - 09/09/2009 13:21 - United States
Top comments
Comments
Double post, sorry!
This argument depends on the type of vehicle you are driving. If you are driving a truck or suv then 104 is right the added height of the hood will likely cause you to slam into the side of the deer so you should brake which would just send the deer flying forward. Whereas if you were driving something lower to the ground like a Camaro then 101 is right, you should speed up because if you brake in a Camaro the front of your car would likely hit the deer in the legs causing the animal to land on your hood and slide up your windshield.
Legally, you're not supposed to swerve in that case. If the animal is as tall as your front bumper, you're supposed to brake, and if it's smaller, you're supposed to stop. One of my friends broke her arm and collarbone a few years back when she swerved to avoid a deer and lost control of her car. Needless to say, braking is safer.
Should've hit the dog
Next time you'll remember not to risk YOUR life over a dog. Dumbass!
That is when you kick the shit out of the dog and rip it's nuts off.
You saved its life. A little bit of damage to your car is worth it.
Keywords
You're a good person. At least it's summer. It would suck to have a cracked window in winter.
At least he didn't bite the shit out of you...