By Noname - 09/03/2009 23:36 - Canada
Same thing different taste
By Anonymous - 27/02/2010 06:36 - United States
How sweet
By Birdman - 23/06/2018 15:00
By diddlebuag - 27/05/2011 22:09 - United States
By Anonymous - 25/09/2016 11:22 - United States - Hills
Back to square one
By Anonymous - 05/05/2009 03:39 - United States
By mandy - 10/04/2009 15:35 - United States
By adam - 03/02/2010 20:10 - France
Good job
By whatnow - 01/04/2012 02:52 - United States - Carmel
By KayyElOh94 - 17/10/2014 22:30 - United States
Not lovin' it.
By Anonymous - 17/07/2018 01:30
Top comments
Comments
u r always supposed to keep all children with u at all times. ur a moron!! i'm a ****** 14 year old and I know that!!
I would understand the clothes thing if it was a one piece, but seriously, why take of his underwear?
It's probably because of little kid's pajamas that are usually all one piece. He meant that the kid spilled jell-o on the top of the pajamas? I don't know, that's the only way it makes sense.
Any number of options for this. Could've been he was wearing a onsie. Could've been OP was going to put him to bed soon anyways so he figured just take off his clothes and put on his pajamas. Could've been he was wearing a top and bottom pajamas but the only ones left to change into were onsies...I think the LEAST likely option here is that OP is a pedophile.
Never leave a toddler alone
he could have narcolepsy and just have spontaneously fallen asleep
Poor bub, was he okay?
YDI for being irresponsible and leaving a 3 year old child alone.
Keywords
dude, take the kid with you nxt time...
Jello isn't liquidy... unless he mushed it into his pjs, you could've just picked it off and wiped the sticky off. No need to change them. Regardless, you shouldn't have left him alone.