By not_trained_for_this - 18/11/2009 06:05 - United States
Same thing different taste
Surprise!
By ilana - 10/02/2012 09:51 - United States
By Bob - 20/06/2009 04:22 - United States
By Samantha35 - 28/01/2019 20:00
Pissed
By Anonymous - 08/12/2011 12:40 - Australia
No good deed…
By Dinho - 15/05/2009 21:22 - United States
By CrappyDay - 20/08/2013 17:14 - United States
By AcademicAdvisor - 25/04/2016 20:14 - United States - Boston
By jessica - 17/02/2009 23:56 - United States
By thisreallyhappened - 15/05/2009 02:39 - United States
By kellb123 - 18/12/2011 00:19 - United States
Top comments
Comments
op sounds suspiciously bitter about this new ordinance...
Makes me happy I grew up in a time before every ******* soccer mom on the planet decided to oppress the system to protect their 'darling little angels' from harm.
My son's school had me sign a form that allowed them to help him in the bathroom if he needed it. People are getting ridiculous.
It's crap like this that made me decide not to teach. Teaching, handling children and parents? Fine. Dealing with stupid rules, laws, guidelines, etc? Not so much. The rules try their hardest to make sure teachers are backed in to corners with their hands tied. And that still doesn't protect any one. If this kid decided to take revenge by telling his parents that the teacher touched him anyway, her career would be practically over, and she didn't even do anything! Makes me sick...
I think any job where an adult is around kids has that problem. 8(
Only in america..
*sigh* Only in America...
I love how everyone is mad at Americans over this. To think: Americans would be so presumptuous to ban touching little kids. Meanwhile, nobody else anywhere else in the globe has ever touched a child...
I think you've missed the point that America has banned HELPING A KID GO TO THE TOILET, not TOUCHING a kid in "that" way. Most every country in the world has banned "touching" kids. Get it right.
You made the right decision. In my community, a teachers aid faced the same dilema. Unfortunately he helped the child. The child went home and told his parents how he was helped. They then took it upon themselves to sue. They lost, but only after destroying the accused reputation and finances.
This is why if you screw someone over you should be forced to recoup their losses however much money you costed them you have to pay it back. That would make people think twice. There needs to be legislation against frivolous lawsuits
Keywords
Then tell them to go to the Nurse, who obviously can touch students anywhere the nurse sees fit,
"Hello, Mrs Doe! This is the principal at John's school. We had to cut his pants again since he couldn't unzip them himself..." "/.../" "No, you are well aware of that we are allowed to touch the children's hips, but not the behind or front." "/.../" "Yes, we used scissors." "/.../" "No, we didn't hurt him with the scissors as we accidentally did the last time." "/.../" "If you say so, Mrs. Doe, we can let him spend the day in his peed pants, but I want that in writing from you and your husband." I really think that the fear of pedophiles has taken monstrouous proportions. Why not tdress the kids up in Burqa to protect them from peeping?