By maxthndr - 10/02/2009 05:36 - United States
Top comments
Comments
yea uhm...what? sorry if I'm wrong but doesn't the sender pay for the txt message and not the recipient?
There was once a time the recipient paid for a letter... Then they created the stamp system. Sorted. Now some people pay to receive texts... Not sorted.
how did you get paid 25 cents wouldnt you lose 25 cents???
Called tense. He PAID for the 25 cents. He lost the 25 cents cause he PAID for it. He didn't say "I GOT paid" he said "I paid" Learn your grammar.
why r u bothered about 25 cent??? that's virtually nothing!!!
so are you saying you had to PAY to RECIEVE a text message ?? thats so bogus!
the rest of the world come to the rest of the world you will never pay for receiving txts or calls again
That was my thought as well! Having to pay for recieving texts? Must suck! Never even heard of it before.. If I'm out of the country (Sweden) I have to pay if I answer when someone calls me but not even then for recieving texts..
haha that's hilarious
I've heard a comedian use this as a joke before...
Keywords
That is so awful... but really hilarious. Definitely something that would have happened to me. I don't have a text messaging plan either, and yet people text me alllllll the time. I usually have to pay $5-10 extra a month for stuff I can't control.
If that's not BS and is real, I'm sorry man, that really sucks.