Public surprise
By Pants-Girl - 24/11/2019 08:00 - Canada
By Pants-Girl - 24/11/2019 08:00 - Canada
By Jac - 17/01/2010 19:59 - United States
By Pantsontheground - 09/08/2018 12:30 - United States - New York
By glam300 - 30/12/2010 18:21 - United Kingdom
By Gitana - 22/04/2012 19:08 - Spain - Tafalla
By AznKoreanGuy - 04/03/2009 06:06 - United States
By violatedbuttcrack - This FML is from back in 2013 but it's good stuff - Australia - Sydney
By ctop - 13/05/2011 05:45 - United States
By whathehell - 27/04/2013 08:28 - United Kingdom
By just_a_bit_akwRd - 04/08/2009 04:15 - United States
By Tommy - 06/03/2012 18:55 - United States
Wedgie!
cover your butt...no one wants to see it
Not no one. After half of us might want to see it!
As OP’s silhouette is of a woman and their name is pants-girl. I’d have to call bullshit on that
If we can see enough to tell what type of gitch you're wearing, your pants are too low.
Even if your pants are too low (and if I can see your underwear or your buttcheeks, they're too damn low), that doesn't give anyone the right to touch you without your consent. A "pull up your pants!" would have sufficed.
Well, how low were they? Were they hanging gangsta low below your butt? If so, YDI. You do know that started in prison as an invitation for sex, right? So you're basically inviting everyone to have butt sex with you by wearing your pants like that.
It started in prison because inmates weren't allowed belts sagging wasn't a choice. Gang members outside sagging in solidarity was.
At least they were pulled up and not down.
100% Sure that if the roles were reversed, the woman would have said rape and many of you would back it
Keywords
Even if your pants are too low (and if I can see your underwear or your buttcheeks, they're too damn low), that doesn't give anyone the right to touch you without your consent. A "pull up your pants!" would have sufficed.
cover your butt...no one wants to see it