Actually, him having the same gym membership as her does not make her a stalker. Nor does him angrily staring down the face of a liar, make him a stalker. Just because she lied to him and wasn't interested, does not automatically make him "below" her, or less deserving of a gym membership as her. He has just as much of a right to be at a public location gym as she does. Besides, most men tend to take gym time more seriously than most women anyway (obviously exceptions occur). But it's totally unfair to expect that HE should have to somehow switch gyms, just because SHE was a liar and didn't like him. This isn't a lifetime movie, he didn't stalk her and find out what gym she went to. Chances are he already had a membership or got one without knowing she went there. Id also like to point out how women rationalize lying to a guy and not texting him. If the guy ever calls her out on her rude anti social lying behavior, she can simply seem him "a creeper" or "a stalker" and then she can internally justify her bad behavior and continue it later. I strongly loathe this technique employed by women. Lying is wrong, deception is wrong, and breaking promises is wrong. I don't care if the guy is sadden Hussein himself. Don't promise something and then break it unless he literally threatened you.