By Boob - 07/01/2010 16:36 - United Kingdom
Same thing different taste
Lewd
By Public Indecency - 28/06/2019 20:23
Great job
By onlyme - 23/05/2009 05:15 - United States
By muffincakess - 21/01/2010 00:55 - France
Thanks, I hate it
By I'm Trading Up For A Dog - 14/12/2014 20:28 - Finland - Pori
Classic
By thirsty artist - 28/09/2023 08:00
By keifer13 - 03/06/2009 05:22 - United States
By hackling fellow - 10/03/2011 13:17
Not respected anymore
By Anonymous - 24/04/2009 09:04 - Australia
By artclasstrauma - 15/05/2009 15:14 - United States
By Meow - 15/09/2009 13:21 - Singapore
Top comments
Comments
You stood outside, in the snow. In the UK, where we've had the worst records of snowfall since 30 years ago? Um. e.o In most areas, it's around -15 degrees Celcius, to -17 degrees Celcius. How the hell you managed to stand out there in the blistering cold, I'd like to know. My feet were frozen within the few seconds I was outside in my pyjamas and bare feet, trying to catch my dog. I'm not so sure if you're being completely honest about this. If you are, then I apologise. But I'm just really skeptical that you could stand outside naked in the snow long enough to attempt to take a picture.
When you redo it put it as your picture on here
that's not a real FML man....leave it as a souvenir, not a big deal or do it aigain ;)
What a weird school. wanting you take pictures of yourself naked...........
god whats with everyone being naked in these fmls?
naked really why you would be freakin cold after words and also neighbors ever think of that lolz but seriously
that is only art if you are living in the 16th century. then it was norm for paintings to b naked. and this is now and that is not art. its called ****. what this person that is doing this want to take pics of herself naked and not do much for a art project.
Oh really? So models posing naked in a non-sexual manner is ****? Here is the definition of ****. "Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal." I don't think this persons primary purpose was for sexual arousal. Seriously get over your prude behavior in thinking the human body needs to be covered up unless engaging in sexual behavior. Think of it this way, breasts are nothing more then a milk producing proponent of the female body( no sexual relation at all...).
Um, wow. Your comment is completely off. Many modern pieces of art portray nude people as well. The human body isn't disgusting. And even if you think it is, art turns disgusting things into something beautiful. Personally, I prefer to paint/draw all my humans nude, as I think adding any clothing taints the rawness/purity of the human's relationship to the surroundings.
So ugly people can't do ****? Cause ugly people aren't sexually arousing. I also love the idea that paint + naked women = art.
@ the person who said paint + naked women = art: It depends on how that paint is used. Plus it's not just women, it's all kinds of people. (Ex, in a lot of my friend's pieces, she makes her humans genderless-- no sexual organs whatsoever). By the way, if you're going to try to sound witty, you have to at least come across as smart.
Meh, artsy people. YDI.
Keywords
Were you going to be the human dalmation?
YDI for thinking that's art.