By Crispy - 21/06/2009 05:05 - United States
Same thing different taste
By missko519 - 22/05/2015 07:36 - United States - Broken Arrow
By Ellowise - 24/12/2009 10:06 - Belgium
By tgstreaks - 23/04/2009 05:44 - United States
By owwwwwe - 09/01/2012 21:48 - United Kingdom
By LXA429 - 12/03/2010 07:35 - United States
By fishwizard - 02/06/2017 20:00
By tan disaster - 27/02/2009 23:09 - United States
By thatsucks4u - 14/08/2010 00:56 - United States
By Anonymous - 10/01/2011 19:06 - Denmark
By kirstyrd - 12/08/2014 06:07 - United States - Germfask
Top comments
Comments
He probably doesn't have any nor can he make any after that one.
Lulz, you don't need to tan your junk, dude.
I will never understand why everyone thinks it's so important to risk several cancers, and looking like an oompa loompa just because they think for some reason that their skin color is inferior. DUMB *****!
I totally agree, if you're looking for skin cancer, you might as well get it from the sun, at least the tan looks better.
They always tell you. It's common sense. If you spend 20 minutes in the sun on an 80 degree day, you're not as likely to get burned as if you spend an hour in the sun on a 95 degree day. If nobody got burned in tanning beds, why would they have different levels? Genius. YDI.
YDI for using one of those cancer contraptions.
Keywords
Fast track to skin cancer.
that's definitely your girlfriends fault! as a punishment, she will have to walk around next to you :)