Wurdz
By onefishtwofishes - 23/05/2013 20:15 - United States - Washington
By onefishtwofishes - 23/05/2013 20:15 - United States - Washington
By NathanA - 08/07/2013 23:54 - United States - Los Angeles
By Anonymous - 06/06/2019 20:01
By Anonymous - 10/08/2019 02:00 - Germany - Wuppertal
By Anonymous - 25/11/2012 00:25 - New Zealand - Christchurch
By Anonymous - 25/05/2011 13:55 - Australia
By raquelcita - 26/08/2016 06:05 - United States - Winter Park
By Anonymous - 19/06/2014 08:24 - United States - San Francisco
By anda1000douchesscourthispostformistakes - 16/09/2015 13:42 - United States - Meriden
By christiner - 06/09/2010 03:01 - France
By frustrated - 29/06/2011 12:59 - United Kingdom
"Fish" is the plural of one type of fish, "fishes" is the plural of multiple types of fish.
You should verify your own knowledge before posting about your perception of other people's mistakes. "Fishes" is an acceptable term, especially in the scientific community. You should have noted that it is a legitimate term when your internet browser did not add the red squiggly line under it as you typed your post. Fishes is particularly used when referring to multiple species, as opposed to just an unspecified group of fish.
Actually fishes is correct for more than one species.
If its all the same kind of fish, the plural is fish. If its different kinds, its fishes. ex: Several gold fish. ex: An aquarium of fishes.
"Fish" is singular or plural for one type of fish. "Fishes" is plural for different types or species of fish. Both are grammatically correct in respective contexts. Source: AP English literature, and my mom, who has been a copy editor for years.
Actually, either form is correct. "Fishes" is just more awkward than "fish."
Keywords
Fish and fishes are both acceptable plural forms of "fish"; well that's what magic schoolbus told me!
Fishes isn't exactly wrong, sweetie.