Forbidden
By grounded - This FML is from back in 2011 but it's good stuff - United States
By grounded - This FML is from back in 2011 but it's good stuff - United States
By notmyfam - 09/09/2016 07:47 - Australia - Chester Hill
By dgilbs - 12/11/2012 22:08 - United States - Grosse Pointe
By justpeachy - 08/03/2010 20:27 - United States
By Anonymous - 13/06/2014 09:27 - United States - Los Angeles
By OhMeGerd - 05/10/2012 14:56 - United States - Scottsdale
By ohcrap - 28/09/2009 04:10 - United States
By Anonymous - 15/12/2023 17:00 - United States - Uvalde
By fuck this shiit! - 15/06/2022 02:00
By Anonymous - 23/03/2017 22:00
By Yoooooo0 - 29/11/2009 18:10 - United States
Did everyone only read the first two sentences? I agree that the OP shouldn't have had her phone on. She, however, does NOT deserve for it to be taken and to be given back until she learned proper table manners by people who aren't HER own parents. That was even more rude.
Texting at the dinner table is rude in itself but to do it when you're meeting your boyfriends parents for the first time? Very inconsiderate. Tells them your texts are more important than they are. Way to make a first impression.
Well, if the text was from her own parents, then yes, it would be more important than they are. I am required by my parents to respond immediately to family texts/calls, therefore if my phone starts to vibrate I'm going to quickly check the screen (note: she was only CHECKING who was texting her, not actually texting) to see if it can wait or if I will have to excuse myself in order to respond.
Should've drop kicked them both in the face
Well, I'd have thought it was well known that not texting at a family dinner is good table etiquette but I guess I was wrong.
Implying that she was texting... The FML states that the OP received a text and went to check. Nowhere did it state she was texting back. Text messaging is becoming a form of communication people use to deliver some pretty important messages. Checking her phone does not mean the OP deserved to have it rudely taken away with no realistic indication of when it would be given back.
Okay, I'll give you that. The parents overreacted. But if OP really thought that the text came in was important enough that she needed to check it right that second, then she could have handled it better by excusing herself from the table or by saying, "excuse me, but I just received a message that could be important, would you mind if I read it?" I'm sure that if the parents were at all decent people they'd have allowed for that.
However, if she was not informed of the "No phone at the table rule," how was she to know that she should request to check the phone? Not EVERYONE has the same rules about phone usage. I know plenty of families who don't mind it when people quickly check to see who has texted/called, but then want you to excuse yourself before replying/answering/calling. If you don't inform people coming into your home of your own rules, how are they supposed to know? There is not universal rule of etiquette anymore, trying to assume that there is (and that yours is said universal rule) is just being unwilling to take a quick inhale to explain your rule.
Don't be so quick to judge, maybe it was an emergency. I'd look, then if not important I'd put it away. Taking peoples stuff away like taking a toy from bad child is more rude in my book
it is pretty rude... but they shouldn't have taken the phone off OP...
Why are so many people saying "YDI for being rude!!."? It was the parents where are COMPLETELY in the wrong in this case. First of all, the FML doesnt state if OP is a teenager or an adult. I guess it would be fair to assume she is a teenager, based on the scenario, but either way, they had no right to do that. OP didnt know about the parents' rule, and even if she did, they had no right to take it. Even if they said "we'll give it back after dinner." they still had no right to do it. Some people said it was equally rude to take her phone from her. No, it wasn't "rude," it was ILLEGAL. Thats THEFT. If OP is 18+, it's theft of her property. If OP is under 18, its theft of her parents' property. I don't find it rude to just check a text at dinner. It could be an emergency after all. Isn't that the reason parents give their kids cell phones? so they can contact them whenever they need to? If anything it's only a YDI because OP didn't stand up to them and say NO! And another thing, why is it that if someone is under 18 they are required to put up with any BS an adult gives them? Minors are only required to listen to someone who has legal authority over them (their own parents, police, ect). This is, in my opinion, why young adults are such ******* these days. No one teaches them to stand up for themselves, because that would be "disrespectful."
I'm glad someone finally pointed this out. I really can't see why most of the commenters here are condoning theft and calling it a lesson of "respect"...
Thank you. This is something that has always bugged me, how people can be openly disrespectful to you, yet expect you to "respect" them because the feel entitled to it. Respect is a two-way street. I mean, of course common civility requires that you give a certain level of respect to your fellow man, but if someone disrespects me, I see no reason to bend over backwards trying to be "polite," especially if this person has no authority over me. What ever happend to respecting yourself? And also, being "under your roof" doesn't give you the right to commit crimes, like taking peoples' stuff. Personally, I love it when I see people do stuff like this, and then get the cops called on them and end up in hot water... And the parents sound like they are either always power-tripping basterds or are trying to break-up OP and their son.
Keywords
It's proper etiquette -.-
Are they one of those crazy families that sit in dead silence while they eat, too?