Support
By CallmeTokey - 12/07/2016 03:21
By CallmeTokey - 12/07/2016 03:21
By Anonymous - 14/07/2016 00:56 - Canada - Concord
By Anonymous - 30/11/2009 21:35 - United States
By Seline - 25/11/2010 14:48
By Username - 08/10/2010 10:53 - France
By Anonymous - 02/03/2018 19:30 - United States
By Anonymous - 14/09/2023 04:00 - United States - Asheboro
By Anonymous - 27/02/2012 12:36 - Australia
By Username - 04/08/2010 05:18 - France
By Anonymous - 03/01/2010 16:35 - United States
By Ringo McDingo - 26/03/2012 04:31 - United States
The more you know ?
I'm sorry but YDI, common sense would dictate that any beam on the underside of a top bunk of a bunk bed is for support.
You are obviously no structural engineer....
Here's your sign.
I always fear that this will happen to me laying on my bottom bunk, one day.
Anybody else reminded of the scene from Step Brothers?
So much space for activities!
I guess it really did have a place there, huh? Sorry op, I hope you weren't hurt too badly. FYL, but be more carful next time.
You Sir, just made my day. Can I assume you won't be sleep on the bottom bunk from now on?
Oh yes, because everyone knows that carpenters sometimes throw random beams under beds for no reason at all! Just for ***** and giggles. Frankly I'm surprised more people don't test this theory out.
Curiosity killed the cat
but satisfaction brought it back.
Keywords
Well yeah, beams on the bottom of a bed are usually there for support. But I guess some people leave the hard way.
Maybe Tokey should do less smokey.