Talk is cheap
By Tris - 12/09/2019 16:00
By Tris - 12/09/2019 16:00
By Lauren - 18/11/2024 22:00 - United States
By Anonymous - 10/08/2019 02:00 - Germany - Wuppertal
By Anonymous - 03/06/2024 21:00 - United Kingdom
By Anonymous - 04/12/2024 22:00 - United States
By Max - 04/03/2017 22:00
By Tristan - 30/07/2020 02:01
By Anonymous - 19/03/2021 21:30
By Anonymous - 26/05/2016 16:58 - Belgium - De Pinte
By probablyadopted1 - 04/05/2016 16:39 - United States - Houston
By Rebecca - 13/06/2012 23:50 - Australia - Dural
As a person with an English degree, there isn’t actually anything structurally wrong. Yes, it’s redundant, but so many of our idioms (such as temper tantrum) are that I don’t see that as a problem. And besides, lots of people say “so very much.” That’s even more redundant, and all OP did was take out the much. Everyone’s just freaking because that’s not how we say it. It’s like putting a contraction where it’s not normal (for example, “I want to tell you it’s” instead of “I want to tell you it is”).
Whoever gave you a degree was wrong.
Saying "very so" is improper grammar, as the words are out of order. Saying "so very" is redundant but technically correct.
Just move "so" before "very" and you are fine. It is the word placement order that makes it sound off.
Keywords
It's a redundant sentence. It should be "You're welcome" or "You're very welcome" "You're very so welcome" is wrong in structure and it's redundant. It should be "You're so very welcome". However, that is redundant as well...but at least that would be structured properly.
You can use "so" to intensify "very," but you can't intensify "so" with "very."