By Anonymous - 23/12/2010 07:42 - United States
Same thing different taste
By Anonymous - 23/12/2011 21:02 - United States
By Anonymous - 23/12/2011 05:53 - United States
By Anonymous - 27/01/2011 05:19 - United States
Merry Xmas
By Anonymous - 26/12/2014 05:59 - United States - Jeromesville
By robincakes94 - 29/11/2011 12:42 - United States
By Phazzer - 16/10/2009 13:39 - United States
FREEBIRD!
By Anonymous - 01/03/2023 18:00
By bitch - 04/08/2010 01:19 - United States
By heronlydaughter - 23/11/2010 03:58 - United States
By Anonymous - 18/06/2012 14:39 - Canada - Markham
Top comments
Comments
You were to eager give them some space huh...
lol since when did Obama go supersize
I think so. It's like when the various religious people come to your daughter soliciting souls. If you welcome them in and try to have a frank dialogue about God and religions, they get freaked out and leave. Apparently where OP lives, standing around waiting for carolers is suspicious activity.
I meant to type door but I somehow like daughter better.
Weird, I like daughters better than doors, too.
Haha OP try not to be so scary next time lol. Also, were** Good day, sir.
No, I'm quite certain it should be were. "He was", "They were".
No... The mod is right. *A* group—singular—*was*.
I don't even understand half of that lol, but OP said "carolers", so I'm assuming that's what changes it. If OP said group instead of carolers, then it could be "was". I still think it's supposed to be "were".
The subject is still the group. If it had just said "Some carolers," the verb would, indeed, be "were." :S
Nope, "a group" is considered the subject here.
Hmm okay then. Guess that's why I don't get A's in english lol.
Thank you, #17. :D
Ironic. It actually says "were" now and I was going to make a similar remark about how it should be "was".
Aww Bee, you suck. I thought someone was on my side. :(
so what happened to good ol comments about the fml and not blabbering on about correct ******* grammar, spelling and gay shit that has nothing to do with the ******* topic.. get a ******* clue and stop trying to act like you're no. 1 forum *****.
Alan's mum is quite correct. Please do leave it as "was".
where's docbastard when you need him, he'd know
Was is indeed correct.
You know what? Who gives a s***
^ it would also explain the FML if you leave the "of carolers" out. Today, a group was coming up my street, so I went out in the cold to wait for them. When they finally arrived, I waved and greeted them. They huddled up discussing something while pointing at me, then skipped my house. FML
Jezzibell, thanks for the vote of confidence, but pendatik has already settled the issue. The singular noun "group" is the subject of the sentence, and therefore the singular "was" is appropriate. Anything that comes after "of" is irrelevant and does not change the verbiage.
Don't you learn this stuff in elementary school?
I can't believe that argument really just happened...worse I read through the entire thing...FML.
Stick around, DeathBat. You will see stuff here that will make your hair boil and your blood curl. Wait, no...reverse that.
8- Normally when you quote, you not only put quotations, which you did, but normally you'd also state where it came from.
Haha no, it's was.
No, it would be was, because they're taking about the group, not just the carolers.
hahah
cat lady?
Looks like you got off lucky. The "carolers" in your area, were actually theives according to my FBI intel. They would sing and distract you, which in turn, would corrupt your mind. In about a weeks time, you would go insane, and commit suicide. Thus, leaving your hone vunerable to a burglary. Do NOT open doors for carolers kids.
lmao wtf
LMFAOLS
Thats nothing new, Jehovah's witnesses have been doing that for ages
Keywords
You were to eager give them some space huh...
Now start throwing rotten food at them like the old guy did on 1000 Ways to Die.