By Anonymous - 21/04/2009 22:04 - United States
Same thing different taste
By OmniVore - 25/02/2010 09:42 - United Kingdom
Countersuit
By SientoBenteCar - 11/04/2024 13:00 - United States
One step beyond
By Go vegan! - 06/04/2024 15:00 - United States
Miss Pissy
By Anonymous - 03/10/2019 02:00
By fuckedbyahipster - 15/06/2013 16:13 - Finland
By Weasel123 - 26/10/2012 07:58 - United States - Anadarko
By BritneyFink - 04/02/2009 21:05 - Canada
Freaked out
By Anonymous - 15/08/2010 05:24 - United States
By Anonymous - 30/10/2011 16:57 - United States
Paranoid
By Anonymous - 02/04/2024 15:00 - United States
Top comments
Comments
You want to know something cool? Fur looks great, especially as an accent/lining/hem/whatever. Or rather, the look you get with fur and the things like it is great. You don't need fur to do this. You can achieve this with synthetic materials. Yes. The look is okay. I've said it. Personally I don't care if it's real fur or not (I actually have a teddy bear with real fur), but the point is, if it had started out as merely a synthetic material it still would have looked great. However, it did not. It is unfortunate that you can't escape the mental image of puppy blood whenever you see faux fur, but that would be your problem (and that of those like you), not anyone else's. And it has nothing to do with the look, it has to do with the fact that animals are killed to make that look when it can be achieved with other materials. If you truly believe that everybody thinks that the look of fur itself is wrong because it carries a message, you're a little bit ... tweaked ... in the head. Yes, it carries unfortunate implications if you care to see them, but the point is that faux fur is not trying to imitate dead puppies because they think it's cool but don't want blood on their hands. It's a style that doesn't require dead puppies to make; therefore, why do it? It's like... you want to get from point A to point B, right? There are two ways to get there and one of them will hit a lot of people's moral buttons. Why put blood on your hands when you don't have to? On the other hand, this can also be used to say real fur is better...why bother using expensive materials when you can just kill a few puppies? In any case, OP, FYL. It's really quite terrible when a misunderstanding leads to a ruined item that was costly (whatever the cost may have been, in this case money). Especially an item like that. =P
#310/craaaackaddict summed it up nicely as well. "They're not against the style, they're against the killing of an animal for it's pelt, fake fur doesn't support that industry."
I hate PeTA with a fiery passion, but I don't see the appeal of fake-dead-animal to someone who is supposedly so vehemently opposed to it. Either you're lying, or you're a hypocrite.
If that would've been me, there would have been a bunch of PETA members lying on the ground clutching their broken noses.
for some reason this one just ticked me off. im saying this in the utmost disgust for PETA that they can go suck a fat, slobbery, rancid, smelly, nasty, green, rotten chode and one day feel the huge dick of society penetrate their dumbass ways of protecting animals. i swear if i see another one of those "im not a nugget" stickers with the chicken on it im going to ****** blow ass on all of your mediocre faces. enough said :]
Keywords
Serves you right for wearing fake animals. Next time wear the real thing so you'll at least deserve getting pelted with fake animal blood. :-D PETA members are dicks.
whats with the red liquids lately? well, PETA is a bit extreme, but they shouldn't be going around bombarding people with red liquids!