By getmeoutofthiscountry - 19/07/2013 19:06 - United States
Same thing different taste
By Anonymous - 25/03/2014 21:53 - United States - Springboro
By orcatheseapanda - 09/01/2016 05:14 - Thailand
By Anonymous - 12/07/2013 20:27 - United States - Los Angeles
By qtpieo1 - 13/08/2010 16:14 - United States
By babyeaternomnom - 30/06/2012 16:22 - Canada - Brampton
By Anonymous - 12/09/2013 05:18 - United States
By Anonymous - 19/12/2012 17:19 - Australia - Perth
By imbx - 13/04/2009 00:24 - United States
By babydoll13211 - 04/09/2009 21:36 - United States
In my day…
By thanks dad - 01/08/2020 02:02
Top comments
Comments
Once they took the pool to their property it was under their care, custody and control. You have no liability.
That argument would never hold up in court. It's the parents fault for not watching their child. It being your pool doesn't make you liable for damages.
Don't worry that won't hold up in court. It was his sons choice to do what he did. And I probably wouldn't lend anything else to that neighbor.
Oooo that's bad....
The reality is that with a good enough lawyer you can probably sue someone for being ugly.
Just think of it as evolution in action
The pool wasn't on your property and you didn't force or dare the kid to jump into it from that height. FYL, but I hope the kid is okay.
Keywords
Your neighbor is an idiot.
Counter sue him for the distress and trauma that you and your pool suffered from having to watch it.