By DeadBroke - 07/01/2010 05:01 - United States
Same thing different taste
By Anonymous - 22/04/2009 15:26 - Australia
By Anonymous - 01/01/2014 07:49 - Australia - Southport
Nice victim blaming, dude
By Awkward - 26/11/2021 16:58 - Netherlands
Spineless
By Anonymous - 10/10/2024 22:00 - United States
By rplovez - 05/09/2011 23:14 - Canada
Spineless
By Anonymous - 01/03/2012 05:35 - United States
By Kiki - 08/03/2013 21:22 - Poland - Myslenice
By Ace - 01/04/2016 02:17 - United States - Mount Pleasant
By well, now what - 12/12/2014 14:39 - United States - Broken Arrow
Now listen here, you lot…
By Angelthecat - 06/03/2020 00:01
Top comments
Comments
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayComment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayReply function is meant to be used for replying. It is not the tool to let your comment stay on the top of the page. Stop abusing it.
Doesn't matter people still abuse just learn to live with it.
I always mentally excuse it if the first comment is lame. Think of it as a sort of redemption shot.
Comment moderated for rule-breaking.
Show it anywayNot counting how many texts were already sent before that.
It's $27 as 540 divided by 20 is 27
ahaha that's when your report your phone as lost/stolen! it works everytime
*reports with phone*
Making the receiver pay for SMS is totally weak.
Why is the recipient charged at all? Here in Australia, the sender pays - the only exception that I know being premium SMS services. Charging the recipient is double-dipping. How do they justify that?
Harsh. I'd report it stolen and accuse him of it.
what is this? you get charged in the us for receiving a text? land of the free my ass
I'm as surprised as you are.
its stupid, i didn't get charged to recieve texs in the US when i am on a UK phone. It seems stupid to charge people who are on the network but not people linking onto it, networks always charge stupidly expenisive amounts to people linked onto them, they charged £1.40 per minute to make calls but nothing to recieve text....
And if you do have a plan, and it's not unlimited, you still get deducted for incoming messages. Text messaging is a racket. It costs the phone companies almost nothing to implement, and they ding you going both ways on them. Also, not every wireless provider has a "don't read, don't pay" policy.
Actually, it costs them exactly nothing. When implementing cell service, they noticed they had like 128 bytes left over that they weren't using, so they implemented text messaging. It uses the same system that your phone uses to tell cell towers who you are / what your phone number is.
Prepaid phone services don't offer any amount of free texts. Each is a deduction from your balance. Same with minutes used. Prepaid phones suck.
That is so stupid. Seriously where I live you only pay for text's you send. When you have to pay for reciving txt's it's like the sender has to pay for a stamp as well as the reciver. That is silly.
^^ hm never knew that. haha.
I've got a prepaid phone, I pay about 20 bucks a month for unlimited texting and free nights and weekends, downside is I pay $.10 a minute, but I get bonus minutes everytime I pay my bill. Prepaid is the greatest thing ever.
yea there's something called a reply
Keywords
what is this? you get charged in the us for receiving a text? land of the free my ass
Making the receiver pay for SMS is totally weak.