By Beestings - 24/03/2013 05:14 - United States
Same thing different taste
By Mel Ancholy - 18/02/2012 02:04 - United States
By not-that-fat - 27/07/2009 13:49 - United States
By Anonymous - 16/10/2010 04:17 - United States
By JennaMarie - 26/07/2009 15:16 - United States
By Anonymous - 27/03/2017 22:00
Some taken
By Atomic_Tangerine - 29/06/2009 23:07 - United States
By uglyorstupid - 20/04/2010 16:46 - Croatia
The eye of the beholder
By Alexea Luton - 11/11/2019 01:00
By seriously? - 22/12/2012 22:19 - United States - Spring
By madamefuxalittle - 08/07/2014 20:52 - United States - Stratford
Top comments
Comments
I don't know if he was that hurtful? Maybe what he meant wasn't that "you wouldn't understand" because you had small boobs or something, but rather that, since you're not attracted to women, you wouldn't understand how much of a hold a good pair of boobs can have on a man. I mean, that's how I first read it. Only after reading the comments did I also see the (possible) "maybe you don't have big boobs" implication. In any case, he's kinda right. About big boobs being helpful for girls, I mean. I'm certain you're perfect just the way you are, or your husband wouldn't have chosen to be with you.
breasts sag, brains last much longer. :)
It sounds to me more like he believes you value brains, not beauty, (which is probably your cause for complaining about the woman in the first place), rather than implying anything about your breast size. But we can get negative about it if you prefer xD
I don't have the brains nor the boobs.
Wow, a sexist jab followed by a self-esteem deflating uppercut.
I'm guessing Kim Kardashian?
Keywords
On the bright side...he's implying that you have brains. And it's better to base a relationship on brains that are compatible, than it is to be with someone solely because they have big jugs.
That wouldn't be a very original response.