By Puddlepop - 01/03/2016 09:20 - United States - Santa Cruz
Same thing different taste
By anonymous - 05/09/2012 16:25 - United States - El Cajon
By Talkingbeforethinking - 16/03/2019 18:00
Slipping up
By englishfail - This FML is from back in 2010 but it's good stuff - United States
By PrettySureItsReal - 09/04/2015 19:38 - United States - Saint Peters
By Anonymous - 18/04/2013 07:54 - United States - Chicago
Technically Correct: The Best Kind of Correct
By Sufia - 28/10/2017 19:51
By terrible kenny - 30/01/2011 09:24 - United States
By Anonymous - 30/08/2012 18:33 - United States - Auburn
By communistgirl - 24/01/2012 16:42 - United States
I have no idea what I'm doing
By Anonymous - 04/11/2023 15:00 - Ghana - Accra
Top comments
Comments
He was a ruthless dictator that killed about 70 million of his own people and took over many Eastern European countries. You should have referred to him as "it".
Hey, even if he was a monster, he still deserves to be remembered as a man.
Bruh for one he killed 18 million still a lot not 70 million. Learn facts before you rant
In Soviet Russia, inconsiderance calls class! inconsiderance ain't a word o-O
I'm pretty sure that proper English is still expected of all students, so whomever it was that called OP those names is just retarded.
*whoever :)
Whomever. Objective.
Whoever because it's acting as the subject of that clause (whoever is modify "it"). Whoever is doing the action (calling), not receiving it (that would be OP). "Was" is a linking verb and always takes the subjective—that's why it should be "it was *I*", not "it was *me*". But it's really not a big deal. I just thought it was funny that the original commenter called for proper grammar, yet used "whomever" incorrectly.
Did you use it in a sentence like "He was a great man?"
There has to be much more to this story.
That's Comrade Stalin to you!
Keywords
I'm sure he was a man.
lol what? but...he is a "he"...we dont have to always call him by name...not just him but anyone...or am i missing something here?