By crawfo - 31/08/2009 13:54 - Australia

Today, whilst on a date I recieved my sixth missed call from my mother. I excused myself and went outside and called her, she and my father wanted to know why I was having dinner and holding hands with another man. It turns out they were also on a date. At the same place. FML
I agree, your life sucks 49 337
You deserved it 12 071

Same thing different taste

Top comments

Oops! Well you had to come out eventually, but FYL :- Also: not last! :-) (I'll be teed off if they close the topic though)

Your parents must not have been too upset - at least they didn't barge over to your table and demand to know what was up.

Comments

Oh, I just had a thought: Maybe OP was out with a woman, but she was the butch woman in the bathroom from the other FML earlier! Wow, if that's the case, then tell that lady to get herself a pink dress. :p But seriously, OP, to each his own, man. Live and let live. But respect your parents and be honest.

Wouldn't it be hilarious if 99% of the thread was on the wrong issue entirely? Fun to think about... Why do people with FMLs never comment on their own with more information? It would be so helpful.

she says another man which means the guy she's on a date with is not her boyfriend/husband therefor she's a cheater

wellinever 5

The OP is a man. His date was a man. Looks like the parents didn't know he was gay. The only "she" in the FML is the guy's mother. The clue is in the tiny print under the post, where it says (man). Look and learn.

you are all giving out about my intlolerance of homosexuals but in doing so you yourselves are being intolerant of my intolerance, saying you want to cut off the tounges of people who are anti gay? really, i think it is you who has issues

Indeed I do not tolerate your intolerance. I'm not sure what you hope to accomplish by pointing this out though. If you think it's being hypocritical, you might need to brush up on your definitions a bit. To be fair, though, only one person (probably with a personal or emotional connection to the issue) actually threatened tongue-cutting; the rest of us were merely conducting a risk-benefit analysis of the strategy.

boatkicker 4
DemolitionX 1

FYL for being gay :D Homosexuality is a threat to our very existence as a species, all you people who support it better realize that. If any of your parents had been homosexual, you wouldnt exist, The very fact that a homosexual couple cannot procreate is a sign of how wrong it is, for the reason we even exist is to continue life. You say that people are born gay...how is that possible? Are you saying that from birth, you have no control over who you will be attracted to, and that the environment, what you learn and what you see will have no effect on who you are attracted to?.So if you were stuck on an island with a female, you would never have any attraction towards her whatsoever? There is a gene for eye color,skin tone, # of limbs, NOT SEXUALITY! PS: I can't wait till 2011 when Obama legalizes the punishment of gays xD

To say that homosexuality is wrong just for the reason of reproduction just shows how little you know. Many straight couples can't have children, and many gay couples do. You probably shouldn't. And don't state your twisted beliefs as if they are fact. Can you control who you are attracted to? Some gay people say they were born the way they are and it isn't your place to claim otherwise.

Sweet Jesus #300, a threat to the species?! You mean our heavily-underpopulated (of course) species of over 6 billion people might slowly reduce in numbers? And that has nothing to do with birth control used by straight couples who don't want babies, gay couples (many of which decide on sperm donation/artificial insemination) who do successfully have children (or in the case of male couples, contribute thereto) are the real problem, right? You've done us a great service by revealing this information!

DemolitionX 1

Many gay couples do? You say that as if they conceived the children themelves. Any gay couple that has a child OBVIOUSLY did not conceive it themselves. For you to claim that many straight couples cannot have children while many gay ones can is just utter rubbish. Any gay person that has a child has to get it from straight people, UNLESS anal sex produces babies, and i sure as hell know that isnt so. And how the hell can they know that they were born gay? Do they have memories of everything that happened since birth? That is just an excuse...and yes I do control who i am attracted to. If you dont, then you need help. Until a man and a man or a woman and a woman can continue a species, homosexuality will always be wrong. Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve xD

DemolitionX 1

lol, well you obviously take our population for granted. THE FACT REMAINS: If every man was homosexual and every woman was homosexual, we would all die out.

Not it's not true. That's why ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION exists. There's war, dying children, and natural disaster going on everywhere in the world and how mankind is going to be destroyed by homosexuals bother you more? Get real. BTW, it's not a choice. If you see a random person on the streets, do you force yourself to be attracted to them and marry them? Or if you have a significant other, do you just suddenly decide by yourself that you're no longer attracted to them? It's much more complicated than that. It's maybe a choice, but it's not an conscious choice. It's an emotion. It comes from your heart, unconsciously.

And what's wrong with a gay couple "getting a child from straight people"? Adoption is a wonderful thing! I plan to adopt in the next 10 years. As long as the couple are (is? I don't know) loving parents, those children are way better off than if they lived in orphanages.

Thanks #308 and #324. I'd like to add that if every couple in the world were gay, there would be no accidental children. Less overpopulation, no children having to suffer without loving families. Background checks could be run on couples who want a child, thus preventing rather than remedying abusive home lives in some cases. (I'm not condoning this hypothetical situation, however; although clean and dry, the thought of the government controlling who gets to procreate is eerily Orwellian to me.) "Until a man and a man or a woman and a woman can continue a species, homosexuality will always be wrong." Man and man donate sperm, woman and woman are artificially inseminated, children are born, species is continued without any need of heterosexual intercourse. I guess you weren't aware of this, but it's fully possible, legal, and in full use today. Purely going by YOUR logic now: that makes homosexuality right.

WPQ14 15

Just putting this out there...how many men against homosexuality probably have lesbian **** on their computer?

Somewhere in the area from "all of them" to "all of them" would be my wager. I love the random "I'm against male homosexuals but not lesbians!" people that pop up from time to time, apparently unaware of the difference between personal taste and morality. :P

LMFAO, good point! I'd guess around 110% (;

Homosexuality is not wrong, dumbfuck. It's just the way some people are. There's no way in hell that our population will die out because of gays. If you haven't noticed, there are a lot more straight people in the world compared to gays. And it's because of many gay people that helpless kids in foster care are adopted! If you can't accept that, then fine, everyone has a right to voice their own opinion. But just consider what I just said.

dont you just hate it when your parents stalk you? ugh it def. decreases the kids trust in them. and its ok to be gay, the only messed up people are the ones saying its wrong.