Compliance
By peeved - 18/02/2011 01:47 - United States
By peeved - 18/02/2011 01:47 - United States
By breakfast tea - 07/04/2012 19:30 - Hong Kong - Central District
By Henry - 13/10/2019 13:00
By Volunteer - 13/09/2013 22:24 - United States - Elwood
By tawan - 04/12/2009 16:35 - United Kingdom
By Rae - 02/10/2009 21:31 - United States
By 4.0delinquent - 25/01/2022 19:01 - United States - Chicago
By F.U. QFN - 28/03/2021 00:29
By boohoo - 06/09/2009 14:21 - Ireland
By 00anon00 - 02/07/2020 02:01
By burnbabyburn - 11/11/2015 17:47 - United Kingdom
I know that feeling. In high school I had to become CPR certified to graduate. Problem was, I was already "doctor-CPR" certified to become a volunteer EMT. But it gets better - I was/am also a CPR instructor. So I was actually licensed to teach a far more advanced class than the one I was forced to take. It wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't so different, and CPR wasn't the kind of thing it's not OK to be confused about. Be thankful that your fire safety class, however wrong, doesn't directly conflict with what you do.
I'm sorry, what you're saying bothers me. You said in High school, which means you are most likely American. Which in that case, the CPR that you were taught as an EMT would NOT be called "Doctor-CPR", but "Healthcare Provider-CPR". Also, in pretty much every state, you have to be 18 to be an EMT, so you can't have been an EMT long if the class you took was in high school. Most schools teach CPR at the beginning of the year. BTW, American Heart Association and Red Cross have different standards, as well as different standards for civilians(I believe they decided on no breaths, just straight compressions)
it's not because the information is different. the health and safety association or st-johns ambulance, depending on where you live, update the protocols all the time due to different statistics they receive. ex: some say that it should be a 30:2 ratio of compressions to breaths, other times they will teach 15:2. it all depends on whether the recent stats say that the circulation getting a constant flow is more important than a higher frequency of breaths.
Any class that every member of staff is required to attend is likely to just be the sort of thing you attend, but don't really partake in. The teacher probably just thought you were being a smartarse. So fuckit, just attend and keep your mouth shut. If your colleagues get hurt from wrong information well then at least you can say you told them so in the first instance.
Sounds like the instructor can't take the heat. Take it to their superior, if not to simply redeem yourself, but possibly save someone's life in the future. In this case, stepping on toes is necessary.
Well I guess your doing your job right, whatever you do you'll be Fired.
Those are the moments in life when you've just got to learn to shut the f. up and let it be. You'll have occasions to criticize the class, but doing it during class is pointless.
you said what I was thinking. I'm glad op has to retake the class I hate being in class and someone tries to take over and make the professor look stupid. ydi for sure
YDI, OP. if you know it, keep your mouth shut, and get through training. Troll: yeah. if they wanted any sh*t from you they'd squeeze your head. ...GTFO stupid troll.
No, it's not Ray sadly. He just confirmed it on his Twitter account, plus you can kinda tell in the way this person phrases things that it isn't Ray. Sorry =[
you sound like my husband op. he volunteers and even I have been asked to leave fire safety training because of pointing out their faults... oh well. if you aren't doing it right- I will let you know. go over the instructors head
Keywords
Those are things that should be pointed out. if the class is miseducating people then you need to report that to someone.
You'd be fired for not taking a fire safety class.. Seems reasonable. But no, really, take it higher.