Freakout
By Pk45 - 11/11/2011 15:37 - United Kingdom
By Pk45 - 11/11/2011 15:37 - United Kingdom
By Anonymous - 05/06/2009 13:20 - United States
By Bigbaby - 11/06/2015 22:29 - United States - Ontario
By confused - 30/04/2021 05:01 - United States
By Penny - 18/01/2020 20:00
By Anonymous - 27/09/2022 13:00
By Stupid - 20/04/2011 02:29 - United States
By LALALALA - 29/05/2009 21:08 - United States
By Anonymous - 23/08/2014 17:51 - United States - Long Beach
By Anonymous - 31/05/2009 06:46 - United States
By Anonymous - 12/07/2024 23:00 - United Kingdom
Because you can't suspend disbelief. I'd freak out if dogs could suddenly talk. Mine would probably tell everyone about the peanut butter!
I'm scared to know what you did with the peanut butter, haha Jk. gross.
Hmmmm Is that what your dog would say if he could really talk? (: suspect!
Omg persix ur a girl?!?!! I always thought u were a boy, well my fantasies were crushed
I AM a boy! If my dog were male, the peanut butter trick would be between two males. My dog is female. Since Enslaved has hinted that science is on the verge of teaching dogs to talk, I will preemptively deny that I have ever done the peanut butter trick with my dog, regardless of what she might say. She humps my arm -- let's she if she'll own up to that!
Roadtrip!
You could just let him watch it alone
Kind of defeats the point though....
Why do people always say nauseous when it should be nauseated instead? I guess many don't realize they have different meanings. Sorry, just a tiny pet peeve of mine. I'll shut up now. Lol
From dictionary.com: "The two literal senses of nauseous, “causing nausea” (a nauseous smell) and “affected with nausea” (to feel nauseous), appear in English at almost the same time in the early 17th century, and both senses are in standard use at the present time. Nauseous is more common than nauseated in the sense “affected with nausea,” despite recent objections by those who imagine the sense to be new. In the sense “causing nausea,” either literally or figuratively, nauseating has become more common than nauseous: a nauseating smell." So, no.
From dictionary.com: "The two literal senses of nauseous, “causing nausea” (a nauseous smell) and “affected with nausea” (to feel nauseous), appear in English at almost the same time in the early 17th century, and both senses are in standard use at the present time. Nauseous is more common than nauseated in the sense “affected with nausea,” despite recent objections by those who imagine the sense to be new. In the sense “causing nausea,” either literally or figuratively, nauseating has become more common than nauseous: a nauseating smell." So, no.
My comment wasn't posting before. Disregard this one! :)
Fine. Now look up the meaning between the two words. Nauseous vs nauseated.
Read my comment. "Nauseous is more common than nauseated in the sense “affected with nausea,” despite recent objections by those who imagine the sense to be new."
#121 From Webster's: nauseous 1: causing nausea or disgust : nauseating 2: affected with nausea or disgust "Those who insist that nauseous can properly be used only in sense 1 and that in sense 2 it is an error for nauseated are mistaken." What dictionary are you people using?
#121-- By the way, it's weird that you're being so picky about this but still used an apostrophe to form a plural...
how did u have a son when don't have a pair down there
That is a bit odd. Seek therapy?
... so I am guessing OP isn't a fan of furries then. :P
the animals are just imaginary. like your manhood.
Keywords
Face your fear? Grow up? Get a real talking animal to desensitize you? I'm not all that sure.
Because you can't suspend disbelief. I'd freak out if dogs could suddenly talk. Mine would probably tell everyone about the peanut butter!