Little git
By Anonymous - 29/12/2009 00:22 - United States
By Anonymous - 29/12/2009 00:22 - United States
By Great. - 22/02/2013 22:32 - Brazil - Belo Horizonte
By Bob - 11/04/2009 00:37 - United States
By Gilbert - 04/02/2025 00:00 - United States - Buena Vista
By Anonymous - 24/01/2013 00:17 - United Kingdom - Canterbury
By GrumpyMonk - 21/01/2022 04:58
By mala_19 - 12/06/2017 14:00 - Sweden
By Anonymous - 02/12/2012 08:19 - Australia - Sydney
By Jim - 23/01/2025 03:00 - Canada
By Username - 03/06/2011 14:04 - United States
By kilo1_13 - 04/06/2009 01:35 - United States
I'm gonna say both FYL and YDI, because while it sucks that all that effort went to waste, you probably should have realized that giving a 7-year-old something nice would end poorly, especially when that something had a toy inside it.
Did you know that your son is seven and a boy? Keep telling him people I'm sure he'll understand your infallible logic.
YDI for taking extra time to make a gift a 7year old would actually want and play with into a dust collector
Do most 7-year-olds THEORETICALLY know not to break things? Sure. Should you leave them unattended with anything made of glass, porcelain, china, or breakables? Absolutely not, because 'theoretically' means shit-all when the kid doesn't realize how 'if I do X, Y will happen' works. Let them grow up before you hand them really important breakables.
Keywords
shouldn't a 7 year old know NOT to do shit like that?
That by the age of 7, they understand not to break gifts. Before I was 7, I knew perfectly well what a snowglobe was and that they were not meant to be broken for the item inside. I had, and still have, a certain nicely made one that I always thought was pretty. Her son may not have liked the gift as much as I liked mine, that's fine, but it doesn't give him an excuse to smash it. My thought is that, like any other mentally competent 7 year old, he knew what he was doing, he's just a little brat who doesn't appreciate what people give to him.