Swoon
By anonymous - 14/03/2010 05:04 - Canada
By anonymous - 14/03/2010 05:04 - Canada
By undanya__four - 10/04/2015 20:19 - United Kingdom - Bristol
By badluck - 21/07/2014 19:31 - Canada - Medicine Hat
By Lovesucks - 02/12/2019 14:00 - United Arab Emirates - Dubai
By Loved - 25/05/2019 16:15
By Anonymous - 07/09/2009 22:08 - United States
By kyla - 24/04/2011 05:56 - United States
By heatherjo - 02/11/2011 04:49 - United States
By 34_22_34 - 28/07/2010 19:27 - United States
By Username - 20/07/2011 23:07 - United States
By NewlyDread - 06/02/2013 02:31 - Canada - Toronto
Why don't girls buy engagement rings to their fiancés, too? I mean, the times have changed, haven't they? We have equal relationships, now, right? A ring from the girl would be a nice statement, saying, "I'm not going to do all the work in the house on my own, I have my own source of income, and I can support myself and our family through the hard times - or perhaps my parents can help me. And with this symbolic ring, I am investing a symbolic sum into our engagement." In this case, perhaps girls would be willing to negotiate the cost of a ring down to 200 dollars, would they?
I agree that girls should get the guy's ring as well. I plan on doing that with my fiancé. However, it's pretty obvious that the girl's ring will cost more, as it will have a diamond(s). Guys' wedding bands usually don't come with stones on them, and if they do, they're very small.
I offered to buy my fiancé a ring, but he doesn't like jewelry. So as an engagement gift, I bought him an expensive bottle of blanco tequila (Gran Patron Platinum). It may not be equal in value to a ring, but since I work to pay the bills while he's getting his degree, it evens out in the end. Point is, love doesn't keep score. You do what you can to make your partner happy.
People don't stay married these days, not even the ones who have been together for decades. So he's being fiscally responsible.
I agree with this. when my wife and I got married, we went to the judge, then that night, had a reception with family and friends. we spent maybe 600 on the reception, and I spent about the same on the engagement ring. while obviously more than the 200 this guy's spending, it was what I could afford, and we were both fine with that. I don't get where people get off telling someone they love that a token of commitment isn't good enough simply because it doesn't cost enough. The mind, it boggles.
surely it doesn't matter about how much the ring costs. if you love each other an elastic band would be enough. maybe he can't afford to spend any more money. and maybe you could be grateful that he's sensible with money too. is money everything to you? be grateful that there is someone in this world who loves you enough to spend the rest of his life with you and be happy. please.
ok...your a whiny spoiled brat, who doesent really care about her relationship, just about some stupid rock. 200 is a decent amount of cash. sure maby not in wedding ring terms, but I'm sure he is low on cash. and even if he wasn't you should care more about him then some stupid rock. you should be happy he will spend 200 dollars and isn't geting u a plastic fake one.
wow greedy the less money u spend on this the more money he will spend on the wedding ring
Keywords
It's about the love, not the ring.
$200 is way more than you should spend on a ring anyway. YDI for valuing the ring over the love!