By BobRyder - 10/04/2014 20:52 - Canada - Edmonton
Same thing different taste
By blinded - 11/02/2011 16:14 - United States
By Lifefail887 - 04/07/2017 18:30
Moist
By HonestlyVirgoHonesty - 01/05/2022 14:00
Can't see for shit
By Anonymous - 09/11/2020 14:02
By Noname - 12/02/2009 06:00 - United States
By CPD - 15/10/2011 04:12 - Canada
By Anonymous - 06/01/2017 06:54
Blurry time?
By Anonymous - 22/02/2023 16:00
By monster1109 - 10/08/2015 15:51 - United Kingdom - Manchester
By fEk - 22/03/2019 09:00 - Australia
Top comments
Comments
Why do you have $100 sunglasses?
I don't see why you don't take your 3D glasses home anyway, it saves you from having to pay for more (I don't know how it is in Canada, but here in the UK they make you pay about a quid for them).
In Australia, they're about $3.00. You're right, it's a good idea to keep them.
In the US, at the very least, they don't charge you separately for the glasses. The tickets for the films are just much more expensive.
It's the same here, tickets are more expensive, but they still charge you for the glasses as well.
Polarized lenses and UV rays. I suggest you do some research on both.
ooch..that hurts...when u figured it out.. sorry OP.. I hope you have a 3d TV at home to make use of the glasses
That's what you get for stealing
You should go back to the theater and explain yourself, OP! I'm sure you can get your shades back.
Aww shit major fail
"Durr durr ydi hundred dollar hurr" -The FML Commentors. One word: PRE. SCRIP. TION. Or maybe they were expensive sunglasses because they work well, and block non-visible wavelengths of light that can be harmful to your eyes. But news flash, guys: people aren't evil for having disposable income.
Well sure, but if you're going to spend that much on sunglasses you really need to be more careful with them.
You can get polarized lenses for $15.
Keywords
Looks like you *reaches for sunglasses*...Aww
You must have gotten ripped off if you confused your sunglasses and the 3D glasses