By Homeless - 09/03/2009 12:12 - United States
Same thing different taste
By kenz - 06/12/2010 08:18 - United States
By skygardens - 21/08/2018 15:00
I like what you've done with the place
By Scammed - 05/06/2016 18:26 - Mexico - Mexicali
By XYZee - 22/08/2012 20:27 - United States - Rockmart
Let me in
By Anonymous - 24/09/2023 08:00
Suspicious activity
By Anonymous - 04/04/2015 04:04 - United States - Baltimore
Landlords gonna landlord
By WannaBarf - 08/01/2022 09:01 - United States - Loveland
By Abandoned - 09/03/2009 05:50 - United States
By uvagirl - 05/07/2013 01:32 - United States
Thanks for all your help
By jruth7 - 15/05/2011 04:49 - United States
Top comments
Comments
@#32: Actually, the "McDonald's Coffee Case" (I'm assuming this is the case in question, as it is the case most people are talking about when they mention coffee spillage in conjunction with silly lawsuits) isn't as foolish as everyone makes it out to be. McDonald's was deliberately serving coffee at unsafe temperatures, and the lady had third degree burns on her crotch. Third-degree burns, on six percent of her body. And she only sued for enough to cover medical costs, the rest was punitive and set by the court. http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm Happy fun excerpts for those who don't want to read the whole thing: A vascular surgeon determined that Liebeck suffered full thickness burns (or third-degree burns) over 6 percent of her body, including her inner thighs, perineum, buttocks, and genital and groin areas. She was hospitalized for eight days, during which time she underwent skin grafting. Liebeck, who also underwent debridement treatments, sought to settle her claim for $20,000, but McDonalds refused. Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above, and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn the mouth and throat. Plaintiffs' expert, a scholar in thermodynamics applied to human skin burns, testified that liquids, at 180 degrees, will cause a full thickness ["third degree"] burn to human skin in two to seven seconds. [if the coffee was a mere 25 degrees cooler, she could have avoided a serious burn] That rant over with: sue their pants off. They deserve it.
if you dont want to sue, i know some people who can have a nice...chat...with your landlord. im sure he would be willing to pay up soon after that.
Good luck with those wankers. Me, I'd be finding a baseball bat...
Sue them until you own the ******* place.
#42 - The old lady deserved MORE than she got in the McDonald's case. People are either ignorant or really effing stupid if they think that was a frivolous lawsuit. Speaking of lawsuits, I'd make your landlords miserable. First, find a new place to live. Then beat their asses with every kind of legal issue you can. Drive them into the ground for this. I'd also consider pressing criminal charges if possible.
The old lady decided to precariously balance a cup of hot coffee between her legs. She was asking for trouble.
I hope you have a good inventory, sounds like a slam-dunk small claims case.
Firebomb the landlords office(When nobody is in their obviously :) )
Keywords
sue!!!
well i'm sure either you/they have insurance, and you can always take them to court, esp. to sue them for not only material but also "emotional" damages.