You just learned a valuable lesson in game age ratings OP. Unless your son is like, 26, in which case I totally think FYL.

This is why the game is rated M 17+ as in SEVENTEEN PLUS not rated E for everyone or even T for teens. Not for kids 8-14. And yes Ezio does have all of his fingers.

Natural selection narrowly averted.

It was the 13th century assassin's that cut off their left ring finger as a sign of commitment. Altaïr was the only one who was in that time period. Ezio was in the late 15th century and early 16th century.

THEY BURNED THEIR FINGERS THOUGH NOT CUT THEM OFF. HOW DUMB CAN A CHILD BE???

if your kid is young enough to try that he is to young to be playing Assassin's Creed. and Ezio is the only assassin who has his finger....

Wow your child is dumb. Altair is the one missing his finger.

it was a test... they did that to Ezio and then stopped him right before he went through with it stating that "modern" technology meant assassins didn't have to do that any more

well at least you can use that money you would've spent on college

if you let him play those games at ages where those thoughts seen logical, then yes FYL for it is your fault