By OnlyMe - 08/10/2009 15:29 - United States
Same thing different taste
By rejected - 29/01/2010 14:14 - United States
By Down - 16/01/2009 14:58 - United States
By nolove - 14/11/2012 10:36 - Australia
Too late
By lynxstorm - 17/11/2009 04:13 - United States
Romance is dead
By Anonymous - 16/03/2010 23:08 - United States
By Anonymous - 10/01/2012 03:30 - Australia
By hikingtospace - 04/10/2016 15:25 - United States - Hilliard
Surprise!
By Anonymous - 19/09/2014 16:06 - Belgium - Poperinge
By dickofbrokendreams - 02/03/2015 05:14 - United States - Waynesville
By Anonymous - 10/08/2018 18:30
Top comments
Comments
No no. guy #1: nice, can sex, doesnt like commitment. she left him for guy #2. Guy #2 can sex, is nice, and is not afraid of commitment. but now that theyre committed, he won't sex her. So basically she found a guy to marry. married him, let herself go, now he wont sex her.
Yeah, probably enough time hasn't even passed for her to let herself go anyways. Technically, they're not even married, just monogamous.
die she die?
that was CONFUSING, my head HURTS!!!
This makes sense to me. I don't see where it is confusing. She left guy #1 because he was afraid of commitment (even though he loved her and was good in bed) for guy #2 that is NOT afraid of commitment (that loves her and is good in bed) so now they are exclusive/committed he doesn't "shag" as much as they used to.
Thanks aahas7. I understood too and was about to explain, but you did it already. :). Not hard to understand.
No.
Keywords
Badly written?
No no. guy #1: nice, can sex, doesnt like commitment. she left him for guy #2. Guy #2 can sex, is nice, and is not afraid of commitment. but now that theyre committed, he won't sex her. So basically she found a guy to marry. married him, let herself go, now he wont sex her.