By burnedboy - 18/01/2010 19:39 - United States
Same thing different taste
By Queasy - 24/01/2010 00:15 - Canada
By anonymous - 17/12/2011 02:06 - United States
By zaynemaliksvagina - 24/06/2015 17:10 - United States - Shrewsbury
By Anonymous - 11/07/2010 18:18 - United States
By dcait_1196 - 16/10/2010 13:14 - France
By Smirky - 13/02/2017 02:30 - India - Bangalore
By embarrassed - 26/05/2009 04:51 - United States
By misspriss - 17/02/2010 01:30 - United States
By escortedout - 23/10/2010 23:14 - United States
By bruised - 13/03/2013 21:06 - Canada - Fredericton
Top comments
Comments
avatar was a good movie, but I think the 3d was kinda unnecessary. the movie would h e been great in 2d
#170, A lot of people didn't like it in 2D, went and saw it in 3D, and loved it. 3D is a lot better.
Serves you right for wasting your time and watching that piece of shit movie. Nobody wants to see smurf boobs in 3D
This makes zero sense. What a tool, I mean. Who watches a movie and thinks the stuff is real? The 3D in this movie had depth at the beginning, but the rest was just gimmicky and standard. There WAS no depth, eventually. How could you be such a tool and think ash was landing on your leg? It doesn't even work like that! Gad! I hate people!
Yeah, and you had a drink because? Your FAT! Only FAT people buy things from cinema stores. FATTY. And quite a retard too.
the only part where i actually got 'fooled' by the "3D-ness" was where the gas grenade came flying toward the screen. it was pretty intense. in fact, 90% of that movie was pretty intense. What an EPIC work of art, worth every cent. So immersive, it just makes you look at the real world and think 'what a shithole'. And leave 3D alone guys, 3D is okay, but it's 50 times better than regular 2D.
I call BS...
Avatar wasn't that great. I admit that I liked it the first time I saw it but that was only because I was high. the second time I disliked it.
Keywords
N00B.
sounds fake lol the 3D wasn't that realistic