By thairsha - 09/02/2012 11:05 - Japan
Same thing different taste
Ouchies
By boomstick - 25/09/2009 13:09 - United States
By hulagirl1217 - 29/05/2010 12:11 - United States
Panic on the streets of…
By Anstice - 05/10/2009 03:07 - United States
By Asshole hornet - 28/10/2013 20:18 - United States - Marblehead
By whatproject - 24/09/2009 09:50 - United States
By Brandon Butler - 04/03/2011 09:22
Another pro-shoe argument
By where's the epipen - This FML is from back in 2016 but it's good stuff - United States - Tampa
By Husband to be....maybe - 09/06/2018 09:00
By rinakitty94 - 29/06/2015 17:30 - United States - Sunset
By don't pray, PAY - 23/03/2017 20:00
Top comments
Comments
Well the bee is dead, your friend is still alive. The bee sacrificed his life telling you to go seeing your friend will help them more than lighting a candle. lighting a candle only makes the person that does it feel better.
What an imagination.
Why are you holding a turd?
I think it's a giant pickle... Haha
It's suppose to be a chode, people. You dont have to be a dirty old uncle to get that one.
94, Is that you, Uncle Lloyd?! (My dirty old uncle… haha.)
Actually, according to buddhist beliefs, karma builds up over your life and determines what you'll be reborn as when you reincarnate. Us Western folk simply prefer to get instant results and proceded to attribute that meaning to the word 'karma'. Research: not just for college anymore.
#20 *reborn, not reincarnated. They are actually two different things. But still, just a small error lol.
#79. Generally when you're in school they don't go into much detail about Buddhism because it is such a complicated religion. But I've been raised Buddhist my whole life. I've actually been raised by ordained Buddhists, some of whom being monks themselves. But anyway. Reincarnation requires a soul. Buddhists do not believe in a soul (at least not a permanent one) and so reincarnation cannot be used in terms of Buddhism. However rebirth does not require a soul for it to work. That's why there is a difference between the two terms.
Well, let me explain how karma does work: The sum of all your good and bad actions determine what you'll be re-born as when you die, as Bhuddists believe we'll continue to be re-born until the point where were reach Nirvana, if we've been exceptional during our live(s). So while lighting a candle for a friend would count as a good deed and result in good karma, it had absolutely nothing to do with a bee sting. It would, however, result in bad karma for the bee, counting towards the bee being re-born as something less worthy when it dies.
That sucks for the bee; not even aware of the rules of the game, or what it supposedly did for that matter.
Buddhism has never been about fairness. The traditional Buddhist hells (Naraka) are far more explicitly horrifying than the vague biblical "fire + wailing".
I wonder if Kurt Cobain reached Nirvana.
Bees die after they sting something. So theoreticly it just made its next live worse and sooner
What if the bee was defending its hive when it stung something, then of course died. Wouldn't it count as good karma?
It works by allowing people to fob off tough moral dilemmas like the existence of evil in a supposedly just world by letting them assume every uncorrected evil is just getting fixed somewhere out of sight.
"Karma" just seems to be a synonym for "nasty coincidence" to morons these days. The morons are welcome to thumb me down. But secretly you know I'm right.
I hate how people cant tell difference between reality and fiction
Karmas a bitch only if you are; the bee is going to catch hell.
That's why I'm an atheist.
Because Atheists never get stung by bees, right? Amazing logic, bro...
108, for the most part the "gods" worshipped in religions are the same man/woman with a different name.
Buddhism does not revere any gods, AKA an atheistic religion. Not worshipping a deity is not the same as not having a religion.
Keywords


cant bee that bad
Something about your actions in previous lives affecting your caste in this life. At least originally.