By Rebecca - 21/05/2012 14:11 - United States - Austin
Same thing different taste
By Anonymous - 10/08/2019 02:00 - Germany - Wuppertal
I mean…
By Anonymous - 16/12/2020 01:57
By Rebecca - 13/06/2012 23:50 - Australia - Dural
By Anonymous - 29/05/2016 05:05 - Canada - Calgary
By Anonymous - 17/05/2014 16:02 - United States - Elko
Whipping boy
By Anonymous - 02/03/2021 02:01 - United States
By ANNIEDBD - 23/03/2012 09:44 - Ireland - Dublin
TW: Gross
By mpfrost153 - 01/11/2021 12:00 - United States
By in_hardik - 11/06/2012 01:14 - United States
By me - 20/12/2011 03:53 - United States
Top comments
Comments
Oh shut the he'll up and quit whining. (but I will literally get a large number of dislikes for this)
Ever heard of the word "hyperbol" OP? Or "exaggeration" maybe? Don't glorify yourself by losing your head over a word that you think all those other people so less intelligent than you missuse. People know what literally means, so as they know what exaggeration means.
The word is "hyperbole," actually, and it's a figure of speech. Since "literally" is the opposite of "figuratively," saying something literally means that you're not using any figures of speech, including hyperbole.
Ok, still work as an exaggeration doesn't it? There is a difference in the language you speak and the one you write. Most of people won't use all the rules while speaking in informal context in order to give more rhythm to what they are saying. Or should we all speak like books to friends? I like literature and languages, but god I think it'd be very boring.
That's literally hilarious. My sister does that an it drives my brother crazy, the reactions are hilarious
Lol, Grammar Nazi, much? But yeah. It bugs me too, when people screw up their English. Like my little brother (12 years old!!!) says 'inside' rather than 'in'. Like: "This year I'm inside Mrs. Whatsherface's home room!"
homeroom* And, he is using it correctly. He is INSIDE her homeroom.
'Literally' in that case is an exaggeration and is perfectly acceptable in English. Your anger is therefore unjustified and you might want to look into anger management if it 'drives you insane' despite being an acceptable use of literally.
No, using "literally" as an exaggeration is not proper. By definition, you can't figuratively use the word literally.
It being acceptable or not in 'modern' English does not suddenly make the individuals frustration unjustified. I would be grammatically correct in saying 'period' at the end of my sentences too, but it wouldn't make the anger of everyone having to listen to that shit 'unjustified'.
It's in the dictionary, not just accepted. So, yeah, this person may be frustrated, but there is no reason for it, so it kinda is unjustified...
what a life !!
someone discovered Parks and Recreation....you can't blame him, it's funny
It annoys my teachers when we say "like" every give words.
Keywords
Your comment literally made me shit myself inside out.
You should say "I'm literally going to kill you if you don't stop saying literally. Literally".