By Rebecca - 21/05/2012 14:11 - United States - Austin

Today, my colleague yet again misused the word "literally." It's driving me insane. I have to work opposite him and hear him say things like he's just "literally shit himself inside out." FML
I agree, your life sucks 24 269
You deserved it 5 192

Same thing different taste

Top comments

Your comment literally made me shit myself inside out.

You should say "I'm literally going to kill you if you don't stop saying literally. Literally".

Comments

andrewmemoirs 2

I can't believe this literally got posted...I mean iiterally read this and was like wow...I can't believe I literally read that.

Dude, **** off. Let him use it how he wants. Shouldn't bother you.

I'd be on your side of the "literally" argument. That's a pretty extreme misuse of it. Still, don't get overstressed about it, as you obviously are. Perhaps use it as an opportunity to feel self-righteous and inwardly laugh at the stupidity of other humans? x) Being a bit of a dick is probably a better option than actually going insane and possibly murdering your coworker violently. Just don't go bonkers.

Thats a dumb thing to anger you. Saying literally has become slang in a way. Alot of people use it that way so you literally need to get over it.

abby713 5

I'd be a lot more bothered by having to listen to a colleague talk about ******** himself inside out.

There's a locally produced commercial that plays in our movie theaters about a man (with 3 PhDs and a Master's) battling a brain tumor. He says that before his treatment, he was "literally scared to death". That must be some fantastic treatment.

But then again, if the guy shit his pants but still had shit in his bowels, he would have literally shit himself :p

Actually, not to sound like a bitch, but he's not using the word wrong. Through modern misuse of the word, the word 'literally' has become a contranym, meaning it definition is its conventional usage, as well as its antonym. In the case of the word literally, it means both literal as well as figurative. The later, is the definition your coworker is using. Other examples of contranyms inckude the word to cleave (to separate as well as to unit) and to dust (to dust off or to add dust while pulling finger prints). Uneducated--and self proclaimed-- grammar nazis tend to take offense to people who they think are less "educated" than they are, when in all actuality these self proclaimed grammar nazis are nothing but glorified assholes with massive egos. -your resident linguist.

kitties_fml 12

why would a linguist misspell "latter" and "unite"? furthermore, you stated yourself that this was a "modern misuse" of the word. just because that's been noted by dictionaries does not make its usage as such any more correct, in my opinion--to use it to mean "figuratively" just seems ignorant.

At 92: I wish I could vote your comment up more than once.

It's kind of funny that you are the most "glorified asshole" with the most "massive ego" in any of the comments I've read. You're also incorrect. Would you like to explain the concept of irony to us?

Smh 87, if you would have just left the last sentence off of your comment it wouldn't have been that bad. I know what you're trying to explain but being rude is not necessary. Language is static, it's constantly changing. There is often no real right or wrong usage of it. There have been people who have faught changes in the English language since it grew out of Germanic. Change, however, is inevitable. Literally has taken on a new meaning. As long as people continue to use it in this new way, it is likely to stick for awhile, regardless of what it's definition has been in the past.

@#92 I really think: Dictionaries > your opinion Just because you don't like it, doesn't make it incorrect. But being in the dictionary actually does make it correct...