By Anonymous - 17/03/2011 22:39 - Dominican Republic
Same thing different taste
Smooth.
By yosmurf - 13/08/2018 23:31
By JakeHolmes - 17/11/2009 06:48 - United States
By watchyoself - 28/12/2016 21:45 - United States - Miami
By happymum - 30/09/2011 11:10 - Netherlands
By HiImAlfredo - 14/09/2014 18:47 - United States - Hampton
By tarheels526 - 08/02/2009 00:53 - United States
By catherine - 17/06/2011 11:32 - United Kingdom
By fmylife. - 29/11/2010 18:02 - Canada
By jshum - 13/09/2016 15:02 - Australia - South Yarra
False advertising
By Anonymous - 29/01/2024 22:00 - France
Top comments
Comments
This is why you don't go giant squid hunting with nothing but a watch on. Of course it'll be destroyed by water!
and u dont sue for a little fricken watch u get ur money back but u r wasting everybodys time by takung a conpany to court because something they made doesnt work
Haha fyl hope it had a warranty ...since you claim it was very expensive then I'm sure it would
You sure it wasn't water "resistant"?
Buy another....
I <3 rats! :)
Wow. The irony.
Hope you kept the receipt!
re fund?
Keywords
well you should sue for false advertisement!
People still wear expensive watches? I thought we used cell phones now.