Wow....first of all, calm down. Secondly - before you complain about a country's legal system, whether you live there or not - do a little research. The dog owner would NOT be able to successfully sue, and would very likely be fined by the court (if it ever made it to the court at all, which I doubt it would) for bringing a frivolous claim. Just because she says she'll sue doesn't mean she can do so successfully. So, next time you try to claim that the American legal system is "spoiled" and "stupid," know what you're talking about first.

while that may be true in this case, you can't tell me america isn't full of - and doesn't thrive on - frivolous lawsuits. as examples? the lady that got her doctor disbarred because he broke her arm during surgery (she reached out, under full anastetic and during an extremely delicate/invasive surgery, and put a deathgrip on his testes). he could not continue, and (after trying every other way), was left with no alternative but to break the arm, finish the surgery, and reset the arm. the guy who decided to sue Pepsi for false advertising regarding the harrier jet on the first Pepsi Points campaign the woman who sued McDonalds for letting ice/drink sit on the floor, causing a hazard (she slipped and fell because of it. she also caused it, having thrown the drink at her boyfriend during a fight not 30 seconds earlier). the student in New Hampsire who's suing the school board, state, and professor after he clamped a cable onto his nipples, and plugged it in during an electrical course (stopped his heart breifly. he claims the instructor didn't tell him it could be dangerous to do so, therefor was negligent). and lest we forget the woman who started it all. the one who sued McDonalds after she spilt her coffee on herself, and claimed she "didn't know it was hot".